Feed aggregator

In a livestream, Mr. Trump formally introduced World Liberty Financial, a crypto venture led by a pair of digital currency enthusiasts with little experience running high-profile businesses.

Connections is the latest New York Times word game that's captured the public's attention. The game is all about finding the "common threads between words." And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier—so we've served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle.

If you just want to be told today's puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for September 17's Connections solution. But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

SEE ALSO: Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable What is Connections?

The NYT's latest daily word game has become a social media hit. The Times credits associate puzzle editor Wyna Liu with helping to create the new word game and bringing it to the publications' Games section. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common.

Tweet may have been deleted

Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there's only one correct answer. If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake—players get up to four mistakes until the game ends.

Tweet may have been deleted

Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media.

SEE ALSO: NYT's The Mini crossword answers for September 17 Here's a hint for today's Connections categories

Want a hit about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try:

• Yellow: What cheerleaders do for crowds

• Green: Shoe types

• Blue: Positions in parliament

• Purple: Sounds like a name

Featured Video For You Connections: How to play and how to win Here are today's Connections categories

Need a little extra help? Today's connections fall into the following categories:

• Yellow: Get Excited, With "Up"

• Green: Kinds of Shoes

• Blue: Legislative Roles

• Purple: Name Homophones

Looking for Wordle today? Here's the answer to today's Wordle.

Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions.

Drumroll, please!

The solution to today's Connections #464 is...

What is the answer to Connections today

• Get Excited, With "Up": AMP, FIRE, HYPE, PSYCH

• Kinds of Shoes: FLAT, MULE, PUMP, SLIDE

• Legislative Rolesk: CHAIR, LEADER, SPEAKER, WHIP

• Name Homophones: DUG, MATTE, MIC, PEAT

Don't feel down if you didn't manage to guess it this time. There will be new Connections for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we'll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.

If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Connections.

The chipmaker, which has been struggling, said on Monday that it obtained a new government grant, signed a contract with Amazon and would pause some initiatives.

Biotechnology company 23andMe has agreed to pay a $30 million settlement over a massive data breach that affected 6.9 million users.

Per Reuters, the genetic testing company filed a court document on Thursday detailing the settlement in a class action lawsuit in the Northern District of California. In the document, 23andMe proposed compensation for victims of the data breach.

SEE ALSO: 23andMe confirms how many people were affected by its data breach. It's not great news. What is the 23andMe settlement about?

In October 2023, 23andMe announced a data breach in which hackers had stolen users' personal records and genetic information. But it wasn't until December that year that the company revealed the extent of the damage. Around 14,000 users had their information stolen, but hackers leveraged 23andMe's relative-finder tool to access even more users, amounting to the 6.9 million affected.

The class-action lawsuit filed in San Francisco also alleged that 23andMe failed to properly notify users with Chinese and Ashkenazi Jewish heritage who were reportedly singled out for their information on the dark web.

So 23andMe is paying up, but that doesn't mean victims of the breach will get an even distribution of the $30 million. According to the court document, only $5 million is allocated towards compensating the users. Breaking this down further, users who filed for an "extraordinary claim," meaning they suffered financial fraud, are eligible for a $10,000 payout. Others, however, are only entitled to $100. The bulk of the settlement will be used to pay attorney fees.

Through the settlement, 23andMe will be required to boost its cybersecurity measures and provide a customized "Privacy & Medical Shield + Genetic Monitoring" to affected users in order to protect them from future fraud and identify theft issues. Once the settlement proposal is approved by the court, 23andMe will set up a dedicated class-action settlement website where users can file their individual claims.

So if you were one of millions of users affected, stay tuned for more information on how to get your (probably small) piece of the settlement.

The internet giant told employees on Monday that it expected them to return to the office full-time in January.

On paper, We Live in Time seems thoughtfully formulated to be the perfect tearjerker for today. John Crowley, the celebrated helmer of the stunning Saoirse Ronan romance Brooklyn, teams with heralded actors/internet darlings Florence Pugh and Andrew Garfield in a weepy romance of wooing and tragic loss. And yet, while peppered with sex scenes and adoring close-ups, this is not a hot or even sweaty embrace of lust and love, but a soggy handshake of a film that underwhelms despite its star power.  

It’s shocking how We Live in Time had the pieces that should’ve been the stuff of Oscar acclaim and audience adoration. But despite bringing together two of the hottest young actors currently working, Crowley’s movie is astonishingly middling, set apart from forgettable fare only by a time-skipping device that feels inexplicable at best and frustrating at worst. 

We Live in Time's plotting gimmick does not work. 

We Live in Time begins with a couple already so well established that they have a cozy morning routine. Ambitious chef Almut (Pugh) goes on a long picturesque run through a lovely forest, foraging ingredients along the way to use in her next culinary experiment. She returns home to a gorgeous cottage and gets to work in her pretty kitchen, while her loving husband Tobias (Garfield) is still sleeping comfortably in their bed.

No sooner is their bliss established over a breakfast in bed than the movie leaps back to before they met, when he was just a sad sack on the brink of divorce with his first wife. There’s thrilling chemistry following a literal car crash of a meet-cute, with Pugh’s signature charm sparking against Garfield’s unflappable wholesomeness. Other moments, like their much memed ride on a merry-go-round, are winsome. But they are tossed into this film with little regard to pacing or theme or any kind of apparent logic.

SEE ALSO: Horrible 'We Live in Time' horse becomes instant meme

Despite the flashes back and forward, their story is straightforward, the stuff of weepy beach reads. They fall in love while she is building her first restaurant, and he is dealing with the end of his first marriage. They nearly break up realizing they have different expectations around children. But they will overcome these issues, as they will her first battle with cancer and its brutal chemo treatments. The main plot of the film takes place once they’ve had their daughter and are faced with the recurrence of the cancer, more aggressive than before. The question becomes, will Almut endure another round of body-wilting chemo that may not even save her life? Or will she reject treatment to make the most of the time she has left?

The second cancer battle alone could have made an interesting movie. But because this screenplay aims to loop back-and-forth to show the breath of their entire relationship,We Live in Time feels more like postcards of a relationship than a portrait that is fleshed out or remotely captivating. There’s so little sense of cohesion from sequence to sequence, it’s hard to get emotionally invested in these characters, even if you’re someone who has been a fan of the actors, as I am.  

Florence Pugh shines. Andrew Garfield is stranded. 

This is the kind of role that seems perfect for Florence Pugh, as it is a woman who is dealing with conflicting emotions that demand she smile and frown with equal passion. Almut loves her husband and her child, but also wants to be more than just “someone’s dying mum.” So when an opportunity to compete in a high-level cooking competition arises, she can’t bring herself to turn it down, even if it means pushing her body to its limits and spending less time at home. 

Again, this could’ve made a compelling story on its own. But We Live in Time aims to create some sort of balance by also following Tobias, who has much less to do. Where Almut is established as having desires outside of her marriage, her husband exists solely to mope when she disappoints him. He’s just Ken, an accessory to hang on her like an anchor. Which is wild because Tobias’s arguments in the film — for honesty in their marriage and for attempting a new round of chemo — are valid, yet undermined by a plotting that treats him as a clingy obstacle to Almut’s professional dreams. 

While Garfield delivers a soulful performance with big watery eyes, the scattered structure of the film gives him little to build on. Tobias is so thinly realized that the audience is left to fill in the gaps, perhaps with prior appreciation for Garfield or a general affection for Nicholas Sparks–style romances where the besotted lovers are doomed to be separated by death. In either case, the film on its own is frustratingly fractured. 

Crowley fails to elevate a lackluster script. 

To be clear, We Live in Time is not the worst movie of the year. That’d be the repulsive and abysmal relaunch of The Crow. It’s not the biggest bomb of the year, which looks to be Eli Roth’s messy adaptation of Borderlands. It’s not even a movie arguably enhanced by some sort of scandal, like Pugh’s Don’t Worry Darling or 2024’s other recent weepy It Ends With Us. In fact, We Live in Time will likely be bolstered by the incredible chemistry its stars are sharing on red carpets and cheeky promotional interviews. But on its own, this movie is far less than the sum of its parts. 

The cancer story could have been enough to sustain it. Perhaps with flashbacks to bolster our understanding not only of this couples' love but also the hardships they’ve traversed before. It could have been a delicately balanced story from both perspectives, exploring how sometimes even the choice of life or death is achingly complicated. But Crowley’s execution of Nick Payne’s woe-infested scribblings of a screenplay manages neither. The time jumps feel like artless novelty, attempting to distract from how threadbare this story actually is — particularly Almut’s first round of cancer, which makes up three short scenes.

While Pugh and Garfield give their all to Almut and Tobias, the chaotic smattering of scenes provides no build in emotional tension. In fact, jumping from the couple already together to not having met undercuts scenes of nervous flirtation with inevitability. It’s like for everything that might work in this film, there’s something else that works against it. Sequences like their first conversation in a hospital hallway and a birth sequence wildly alive with energy offer moments of hope that Crowley and company will cut their way through the messy plot device of time-skipping to hook into something unshakably profound. 

But in the end, We Live in Time is profoundly mediocre, lacking the verve, sexiness, and raw human emotion we’ve come to expect from Pugh and Garfield. 

We Live in Time was reviewed out of its world premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival. The movie will open in theaters in the U.S. on Oct. 11. 

A new survey found that parents significantly underestimate their teen's use of generative artificial intelligence. The technology, popularized by the conversational platform ChatGPT, allows users to ask pretty much any question of an AI bot and receive a specific and detailed original response. 

The survey, conducted this spring by the nonprofit organization Common Sense Media, polled 1,045 U.S. adult parents and their teens. Overall, 70 percent of the teens said they used generative AI. 

Of the teens who said they'd used at least one platform, only 37 percent of their parents were aware of their use. Almost a quarter of parents whose child had used the technology didn't know it, and nearly 40 percent of the adult respondents whose teen had experimented with the tools weren't sure about their experience doing so. 

SEE ALSO: AI apps can automate your home life, and it's more cool than scary

Teens with generative AI experience said they most commonly used platforms for homework help, to avoid being bored, and to translate something from one language to another. Many of the teens admitted to using generative AI for school assignments without the teacher's permission. Some teens created new content using someone else's voice or image, sometimes as a joke or to tease another person. While participants were asked about their experience with using AI to make explicit nonconsensual imagery, those findings will be included in a future report.

Amanda Lenhart, head of research for Common Sense Media, said that parents should start discussing the complexities of generative AI with their children so that they're prepared for what they might encounter. 

"You've got to talk about it because your kids are already using it, even if you don't think they are," Lenhart said. 

What your teen should know about generative AI 

While the technology may benefit teens in numerous ways, Lenhart noted that young users may not be aware of its potential for reproducing bias and sharing incorrect or misleading information, often known as hallucinations. 

Teens also might not know when using generative AI tools is tantamount to cheating; or violates another person's privacy, when it's used to create imagery without their consent; or, understand that the large language models upon which generative AI platforms are built can have different training, tuning, and guardrails.

"These tools pull from the best and the worst of the internet and the best and worst of humanity, and that means that sometimes what they share with us is both wrong and awful," Lenhart said. 

Parents may not know any of this important information if they've not read about or used generative AI, which is why it's helpful for adults to familiarize themselves with the technology as they start discussing it with their child, Lenhart added. 

She recommends that parents test out platforms that use this technology. They may even already spend time on platforms or services that incorporate generative AI, without realizing it. 

Google's Gemini search product, for example, currently produces generative responses to user inquiries. Meta's Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp communication tools have generative AI capabilities as well. Basic Meta AI prompts include "give me a personality quiz" and "how do I speed read?" 

Teens on Snap likely know its generative chatbot My AI, which adults could experiment with and then discuss with their child, Lenhart said. 

When engaging with teens about generative AI, parents can play with the technology together with or alongside their child. Lenhart cited asking it to write a silly poem, make up Halloween costume ideas, or plan a week of meals as examples. A parent could also watch their teen test a chatbot's knowledge of a topic they're passionate about and then discuss how to know whether the AI was wrong or right. 

Whatever parents choose, Lenhart says to focus on finding ways to help teens identify how AI platforms do or don't work and have that conversation together.

Generative AI at school

The survey suggests those discussions aren't happening in the classroom, which Lenhart said is consequential. 

Common Sense research shows that teens who do participate in complex conversations and lessons about the topic at school have a more nuanced understanding of generative AI's pros and cons. But the survey found that this isn't happening for over half of the young respondents. 

Lenhart said it's important for teens to be told the rules for using generative AI when completing schoolwork, which may vary from teacher to teacher. 

"Most adolescents don't want to cheat." - Amanda Lenhart, head of research for Common Sense Media

"Most adolescents don't want to cheat," Lenhart said. "They want to use it in a way that is appropriate for learning, so tell them where that is so they can walk up to that line and not cross it."

And according to the survey, suspicion of cheating may disproportionately affect Black students. In the survey, Black teens were twice as likely as White and Latino teens to say that their teachers incorrectly flagged their schoolwork as the product of generative AI when it wasn't. Lenhart said this finding mimics historic inequities in school-based discipline for Black youth.

"AI tools are not exempt from the bias you probably already experience in your school," Lenhart said.

The issue illustrates why it's so important that adults, at school and home, are aware of the challenges that teens will face in the era of generative AI.

TikTok on Monday pushed back against a law that would force the popular video app to sell to a non-Chinese owner or be banned, in what is shaping up to be a landmark case.

TL;DR: Grab a refurbished iPad Pro 12.9" 4th-Gen for $599.99 (reg. $1,299) and experience high-end performance and versatility at more than half off the usual price.

Looking for high-end performance without the hefty price tag? The refurbished 4th-generation Apple iPad Pro offers all the power you need for both work and play — but priced at $599.99, a fraction of the cost of a new one. With its thin design and stunning 12.9-inch Liquid Retina display, everything from streaming to sketching feels like a premium experience.

And let’s not forget, this model is from 2020, so you’re still getting fairly recent tech without the sticker shock. It's also been given an "A" refurbished rating, which means it's in near-mint conditions with minimal to no signs of use.

Powered by the A12Z Bionic chip, this iPad Pro handles demanding tasks like video editing, graphic design, and running multiple apps with ease. The 128GB of storage gives you plenty of space to keep your projects, apps, and files, making it a useful tool for creatives and professionals alike. Whether you’re editing 4K videos or diving into advanced productivity apps, this iPad is built to keep up.

With up to 10 hours of battery life, you can stay productive all day without needing to recharge. Plus, because it’s refurbished, you get all these high-end features for a fraction of the cost of a new device — and without sacrificing quality. Rigorously tested, it works like new and offers unbeatable value.

If you’re after a tablet that’s powerful, versatile, and still relatively new, this refurbished 2020 iPad Pro 12.9" 4th-Gen is on sale for 53% off at $599.99 for a limited time.

StackSocial prices subject to change.

Opens in a new window Credit: Apple Apple iPad Pro 12.9" 4th Gen (2020) 128GB Wi-Fi Space Gray (Refurbished) $599.99
$1,299.00 Save $699.01 Get Deal

The best TV deals at Target as of Sept. 16: BEST OVERALL TCL 55-inch Q6 QLED 4K Google TV $319.99 at Target (save $130) Get Deal BEST BUDGET TV DEAL Westinghouse 50-inch 4K Roku TV $199.99 at Target (save $80) Get Deal BEST SPLURGE TV DEAL LG 65-inch C4 OLED evo 4K TV $1,696.99 at Target (save $1,003) Get Deal

Although we're already heading into week three of the NFL season, we're still seeing some pretty solid deals on TVs of all shapes, sizes, and brands. And we're certainly not complaining.

If you still haven't upgraded your non-smart TV into this century, it's beyond time to get with the times. It doesn't need to cost a fortune, either. With Target's best TV deals this week, you can save up to 37% on a new model and start seeing the actual details of each football game. Not to mention, you can finally watch all the best shows and movies of 2024 (so far) the way they're meant to be viewed.

We've pulled the best TV deals we think are worth adding to your cart the week of Sept. 16 at Target to help you make your choice.

Best TV deal at Target Opens in a new window Credit: TCL Our pick: TCL 55-inch Q6 QLED 4K Google TV $319.99 at Target
$449.99 Save $130.00 Get Deal Why we like it

TCL's Q6 series is a middle of the road QLED TV that can level up your viewing experience — whether you want to enhance the football season or queue up the best movies of 2024. It gets brighter than the Q5, supports both HDR10+ and Dolby Vision, optimizes each scene via the AIPQ processor, and supports 120Hz VRR in Game Accelerator mode. It's also loaded with Motion Rate 240 motion smoothing technology and three HDMI ports, making it a pretty solid TV for gamers on a budget. It's on sale for just $319.99 at Target as of Sept. 16. That's a savings of nearly 30%. For what it's worth, it's also sitting at a similar discount at both Best Buy and Amazon at the time of writing.

Best budget TV deal Opens in a new window Credit: Westinghouse Our pick: Westinghouse 50-inch 4K Roku TV $199.99 at Target
$279.99 Save $80.00 Get Deal Why we like it

If you're just looking for a solid 4K TV to stream your favorite shows and movies, this Westinghouse 50-inch Roku TV should do the trick for under $200. It may lack the bells and whistles of a fancy QLED model, but it will still offer a more than acceptable 4K viewing experience. And for most people, that's all you really need. The real benefit with this model is the convenience of built-in Roku TV, which brings you over 350 live channels for free, plus organizes all of your streaming apps for easy viewing. It's also loaded with four HDMI ports for streamlined connectivity.

Best splurge TV deal Opens in a new window Credit: LG Our pick: LG 65-inch C4 OLED evo 4K TV $1,696.99 at Target
$2,699.99 Save $1,003.00 Get Deal Why we like it

For those looking to bring the magic of cinema home and enjoy the best possible viewing experience, you'll want to go for a higher end model like LG's C4 OLED evo 4K TV. A newer version of our favorite TV for gaming, the C4 features an updated processor, upgraded software, a 144Hz maximum refresh rate (vs. the previous model's 120Hz), and an even brighter and more dynamic screen. Plus, with an almost invisible bezel and the ability to display paintings, photos, and other content of your choosing, it can blend seamlessly into your space when you're not watching. Usually a splurge at $2,699.99, it's on sale for just $1,696.99 at Target as of Sept. 16, which will save you 37%. Currently, Amazon is the only retailer matching this low price.

More TV deals at Target

• Westinghouse 24-inch 720p Roku TV — $84.99 $109.99 (save $25)

• VIZIO 32-inch D-Series FHD TV — $144.49 $169.99 (save $25.50)

• LG 55-inch UT75 Series 4K TV — $379.99 $429.99 (save $50)

• TCL 65-inch S5 4K Google TV – $379.99 $449.99 (save $70)

• VIZIO 50-inch MQX 4K QLED TV — $499.99 $549.99 (save $50)

• LG 55-inch QNED 4K TV — $749.99 $799.99 (save $50)

• Samsung 65-inch Q60D QLED 4K TV — $799.99 $899.99 (save $100)

Kicking off the second week of an antitrust trial, Neal Mohan testified that Google did what was best for consumers and the ad industry.

After a year and a half of Copilot, the generative AI tool is getting to a genuinely useful place. That literal and figurative place is in Microsoft Excel.

At the Microsoft 365 Copilot livestream on Monday, CEO Satya Nadella announced Copilot features for the OG spreadsheet program and other 365 apps like PowerPoint, a collaborative "canvas" called Copilot Pages, and customizable AI Agents.

While the livestream was mostly meant for Microsoft's enterprise customers and not for the casual viewer (it was hosted on LinkedIn, for Pete's sake), there were plenty of features and announcements for every Microsoft 365 user to appreciate.

We've rounded up the takeaways from the event that you need to know about.

SEE ALSO: Everything announced at Google I/O, including AI Agents, Ask Photos, and more New Copilot features in Excel, PowerPoint, Teams, Outlook, Word, and OneDrive

As mentioned above, Copilot for Excel is a noteworthy addition to the suite of capabilities. Copilot can help Excel users format data, help with common formulas like XLOOKUP and SUMIF, and visualize data in charts and pivot tables. It can also work with text, not just numbers, so users can search for keywords and phrases and analyze data accordingly. Copilot in Excel is live today.

Microsoft also shared that Copilot in Excel understands Python, so users who aren't familiar with the programming language can use Python without having any prior coding knowledge.

Copilot in Excel now knows Python. Credit: Microsoft

In PowerPoint, Copilot can generate an outline of a presentation from a prompt by pulling in your data from 365 sources. Then it can slot information into individual slides and design a presentation — even pulling in brand pictures or DALL-E 3-based AI-generated images. Copilot's "Brand Narrative" feature in PowerPoint doesn't have a launch date, but it's coming soon, according to the announcement.

Copilot's Brand Narrative tool does the heavy lifting of making a PowerPoint. Credit: Microsoft

Copilot was already used for summarizing meeting transcripts in Teams, but now it can also incorporate conversations happening in the chat. This feature will be available this month.

For Outlook, Copilot can prioritize important emails in your inbox and give summaries of what each email entails, and generate recommended responses. Sounds familiar? Apple recently announced a similar feature for its Mail app that uses Apple Intelligence to prioritize and summarize your inbox. Prioritizing your inbox will be available for public preview at the end of 2024.

Coming soon, Copilot can prioritize your emails in Outlook. Credit: Microsoft

Word also leverages Copilot's summarization and data gathering capabilities. With the Copilot sidebar, users can pull in work data from the emails, other 365 apps, and the web to generate drafts within your document. This is also now generally available.

Last but not least, the whole thing that makes it all possible is OneDrive, the cloud storage platform that stores all your work data — it's also getting an AI-powered facelift. On OneDrive, Copilot will help you find and sort through relevant files, and summarize them, so you don't have to click around looking for the file you need. This is rolling out now to OneDrive now and will be broadly available later this month.

Copilot Pages for collaborating on Copilot responses

With Microsoft's new Copilot Pages tool, users can share Copilot responses with other team members, and collaborate on a project in a freestanding canvas within BizChat.

"You and your team can work collaboratively in a page with Copilot, seeing everyone’s work in real time and iterating with Copilot like a partner, adding more content from your data, files, and the web to your Page," the announcement said. It eliminates the need for independent research within Copilot by allowing other users to build upoon the initial Copilot response.

Copilot responsive become collaborative with a new Pages tool. Credit: Microsoft

Copilot Pages are available through BizChat starting today, and will roll out to the free Microsoft Copilot version in the coming weeks for users with a Microsoft Entra account.

Copilot Agents get general availability

Unveiled last May, Copilot agents act as customizable AI-powered assistants for automating certain tasks. Similar to a Google feature called AI Teammates that was showcased at Google I/O, users can share internal knowledge and databases with agents and train to run certain tasks in the background. This could be creating an agent to onboard a new employee, or an agent that serves as a field service technician for troubleshooting on-site problems with machinery.

A customized Copilot agent can troubleshoot on-site issues. Credit: Microsoft

As of today, agents are generally available. With this announcement, Microsoft has also launched an agent builder, a user-friendly tool which helps users easily build an agent without the need for prompt engineering know-how. Copilot agents will be available through BizChat and will roll out to customers in the coming weeks.

TL;DR: Get a 1-year Sam's Club membership with auto-renew for just $15 (reg. $50).

If you're tired of rising membership fees elsewhere, it's time to consider an affordable, all-in-one solution. For just $15 (regularly $50), you can become a Sam's Club member and unlock access to incredible savings, seasonal products, and an unmatched selection of quality items.

Whether you're shopping for groceries, home essentials, electronics, or holiday gifts, Sam’s Club is the place to be. And with auto-renew, you’ll never have to worry about losing access to the membership benefits you love.

Sam’s Club is more than just a place to shop—it’s a lifestyle upgrade. Imagine a membership that not only helps save you money but also works hard to simplify your life and enhance your day-to-day experiences.

With Sam’s Club, you get access to a wide range of exclusive member perks that go beyond the shopping aisles. From travel discounts to prescription savings and member-only events, this membership offers more than just a cart full of great deals.

Planning a vacation? Sam’s Club members enjoy exclusive discounts on hotels, car rentals, and even live events. These savings make it easier to plan your next getaway, leaving more money in your pocket for the things that matter.

Need to fill a prescription? Sam’s Club also offers prescription savings, making it an essential part of your healthcare routine. And don’t forget the member-only events, where you get access to special deals and promotions that make your shopping experience even more rewarding.

By cutting down the time and money you spend on shopping, you’ll have more freedom to focus on the things that really matter, like spending time with family, enjoying your hobbies, or exploring new experiences.

Skip the rising prices at other stores and get a 1-year Sam's Club membership with auto-renew for just $15 (reg. $50).

StackSocial prices subject to change.

Opens in a new window Credit: Sam's Club $15 for a Sam's Club 1-Year Club Membership with Auto-Renew $15.00
$50.00 Save $35.00 Get Deal

James McAvoy is joined by Scoot McNairy and 'Speak No Evil' writer / director James Watkins in laying out how their remake is different from the original.

Save 45%: For Sept. 16 only, you can grab refurbished AirPods Max from Best Buy for just $299.99. Compared to the headphones' full price of $549 brand new, you'll save $249.01.

Opens in a new window Credit: Apple Refurbished Apple AirPods Max $299.99 at Best Buy
$549.00 Save $249.01 Get Deal

Apple unveiled new AirPods Max at its "Glowtime" event last week, but if you don't care all that much about USB-C charging or the new colorways, you can actually get essentially the same headphones for much cheaper.

Enter: Best Buy's deal of the day, which marks down refurbished AirPods Max in all available colorways to just $299.99. Typically, the retailer will offer these headphones refurbished for about $400, while new Maxes go for $549 at full price, and $394.99 at the absolute lowest price we've ever seen them. In other words, this is a really solid deal, and likely one of cheapest prices you can grab the AirPods Max for, but you'll want to act quick — the sale ends when the day is up.

SEE ALSO: Apple iOS 18 release date today: When you can download it

If you're hesitant on buying this 2020 model when the new AirPods Max just came out, we have to reiterate that we weren't exaggerating at the top of the article. The only differences with the "new" AirPods is that they have a USB-C charging port, and five new color ways. Performance-wise, they are the exact same headphones, with the same battery life, active noise cancellation, chipset, and design.

Usually, we don't recommend these headphones because their cost-to-feature ratio isn't competitive with other noise-cancelling over-ear headphones on the market. We don't like that they come without an audio jack or a case, and that their battery life is middling for headphones that cost over half of a thousand dollars. However, at $300, these cons are much more stomachable, and the value much more present.

SEE ALSO: The 7 best noise-cancelling headphones for flying in 2024

Plus, Best Buy states its Geek Squad certified refurbished products are repaired to a "like-new" state, and can still be returned within its standard 15-day window.

UP TO 25% OFF: As of Sept. 16, Target is offering 25% (or more) off select floor care items. Shop Bissel, Shark, and more.

Our top picks: Best Shark deal Shark Rocket Ultra-Light Corded Stick Vacuum (HV301) $129.99 at Target (save $70 ) Get Deal Best Bissell deal Bissell CrossWave All-in-One Multi-Surface Wet Dry Vacuum (1785) $199.99 at Target (save $30) Get Deal Best Bissell deal Hoover SmartWash Automatic Carpet Cleaner Machine and Upright Shampooer (FH52000) $199.99 at Target (save $80) Get Deal

With Amazon’s Prime Day on the horizon, other retailers are dropping prices on popular items, like vacuums, small tech, and other gadgets — things that people usually flock to Amazon to buy during the bi-annual shopping event.

Right now, Target’s offering discounts on tons of cleaning and household essentials, including vacuums, mops, spot cleaners, and more. If you can’t wait for Prime Day or want to avoid the chaos, Target might be the place to shop.

Here are our top picks from the sale:

Best Shark deal Opens in a new window Credit: Shark Our pick: Shark Rocket Ultra-Light Corded Stick Vacuum (HV301) $129.99 at Target
$199.99 Save $70.00 Get Deal Why we like it

The Shark Rocket Ultra-Light Corded Stick Vacuum (HV301) is on sale for $129.99 at Target. That’s a 35% discount or $70 off the usual price.

This lightweight corded stick vacuum works on carpets and hard floors and can convert into a hand vacuum for above-floor cleaning. It comes with a crevice tool, upholstery tool, and dusting brush, and the swivel steering makes it easy to maneuver around furniture and into tight spaces.

More Shark deals

• Shark Professional Steam Pocket Mop (S3601) — $87.99 $109.99 (save $22)

• Shark Steam and Scrub All-in-One Scrubbing and Sanitizing Hard Floor Steam Mop (S7001TGT) — $159.99 $179.99 (save $20)

• Shark Navigator Lift-Away ADV Upright Vacuum (LA401) — $229.99 $299.99 (save $70)

• Shark Matrix Robot Vacuum (RV2310) — $249.99 $299.99 (save $50)

Best Bissell deal Opens in a new window Credit: Bissell Our pick: Bissell CrossWave All-in-One Multi-Surface Wet Dry Vacuum (1785) $199.99 at Target
$229.99 Save $30.00 Get Deal Why we like it

The Bissell CrossWave All-in-One Multi-Surface Wet Dry Vacuum (1785) is a wet and dry vacuum that vacuums and mops the floor at the same time. It’s safe on tile, hardwood, laminate, linoleum, rubber floor mats, pressed wood, area rugs, and more. Plus, the two-tank technology keeps the cleaning solution separate from the dirty water, so you’re not double-dipping.

It’s on sale for $199.99 at Target, a 13% discount or $30 off the original price.

More Bissell deals

• Bissell Little Green Portable Carpet Cleaner — $99.99 $123.99 (save $24)

• Bissell CleanView Pet Slim Corded (3925) — $129.99 $149.99 (save $20)

• Bissell CrossWave Pet Pro Multi-Surface Wet Dry Vaccum (2306) — $219.99 $269.99 (save $50)

Best Hoover deal Opens in a new window Credit: Hoover Our pick: Hoover SmartWash Automatic Carpet Cleaner Machine and Upright Shampooer (FH52000) $199.99 at Target
$279.99 Save $80.00 Get Deal Why we like it

We don’t talk about Hoover vacuums enough. This brand has been around for years, yet Dyson and Shark seem to get all the buzz.

The Hoover SmartWash Automatic Carpet Cleaner Machine and Upright Shampooer (FH52000) is designed to give your carpets a deep clean without the hassle of using a heavy, bulky machine (or hiring a professional carpet cleaning service).

There’s no solution measuring or mixing required — the machine automatically dispenses the right amount of cleaning solution and then sucks up the dirty water as you push and pull the machine across the floor. If you have pets, kids, or just a lot of foot traffic in your home, this carpet cleaner is a worthy investment at the sale price of $199.99 (29% off the usual $279.99 price tag).

More Hoover deals

• Hoover CleanSlate Portable Carpet and Upholstery Spot Cleaner (FH14000) — $99.99 $139.99 (save $40)

• Hoover ONEPWR Emerge Cordless Stick Vacuum (BH53605V) — $199.99 $249.99 (save $50)

Scientists from the United States, China and other nations called for an international authority to oversee artificial intelligence.

Efforts by the Beijing-backed Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, or SMIC, to break through innovation barriers have landed it in a geopolitical tech battle.

Big Tech's data hunger is even worse for the environment than its main players let on, according to a new investigation by the Guardian. The all-out push for AI (and the necessary processing energy it demands) is only exacerbating the demand.

SEE ALSO: How much is AI hurting the planet? Big tech won't tell us.

The new report analyzed real (or location-based) emissions from Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple's company-owned data centers, finding that their total reported emissions are likely more than 7 times (or 662 percent) higher than current reports. The disparity, according to the Guardian, can be attributed to what experts call "creative accounting" of emissions via renewable energy certificates (Recs). Purchased Recs allow companies to offset some of its electricity consumption to renewable energy-generated electricity (basically "cancelling out" its emissions). But these renewable energy sources are often not actually consumed by the company's perpetrating facilities or even those nearby.

Rather than a true estimate of emissions in a specific area, companies are using "market-based" emission figures skewed by Recs. Meta's 2022 location-based carbon dioxide emissions, for example, are 19,000 times higher than its official data center figures. The report also contends that it's "almost impossible" to assess if companies are including third-party emissions in estimates of data centers' environmental impact.

Amazon was notably left out of the 600 percent figure, but for good reason — the company is exponentially more of a polluter than any of the other companies, with Apple, the second-largest emitter, offloading less than half of Amazon's emissions. Amazon, aided by Meta, is also behind an industry push to keep Recs in the emissions accounting process. Google and Microsoft, on the other hand, have or are planning to phase out Recs from their reporting figures.

Globally, AI's environmental impact is still being negotiated, especially as AI outpaces typical cloud-based applications in energy consumption. Google recently revealed that its total greenhouse gas emissions have increased by 48 percent between 2019 and 2023, with the majority of the increase pegged to AI investments beginning in 2022. X CEO Elon Musk recently came under fire for the operation of his Tennessee-based xAI data center (powering the generative AI chatbot Grok), which has allegedly been more than dozen gas-powered turbines without environmental permits. Environmental groups denounced the company for violation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s smog standards.

Prior to the "AI boom," data centers made up around 1-1.5 percent of global electricity consumption, according to the International Energy Agency, but it is expected to double by 2026.

Elon Musk, owner of social media platform X and CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, deleted a post referencing assassinations of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris early Monday morning.

“And no one is even trying to assassinate Biden/Kamala 🤔,” Musk wrote. 

Credit: X / Mashable Screenshot

Musk's now-deleted X post quoted another X user who commented about what the FBI said "appeared to be an attempted assassination” on former President Donald Trump on Sunday. This would mark the second assassination attempt on Trump after a gunman opened fire at one of his rallies over the summer.

Musk was roundly criticized for his post. Some X users questioned why Musk still has security clearance, a privilege provided to him as CEO of SpaceX. 

In follow up posts, Musk initially defended his comment.

"No one has even tried to do so is the point I’m making and no one will," Musk said.

Musk eventually deleted the post. He now claims that the post was a "joke."

Tweet may have been deleted

"Well, one lesson I’ve learned is that just because I say something to a group and they laugh doesn’t mean it’s going to be all that hilarious as a post on 𝕏," Musk posted after deleting his assassination post. 

Tweet may have been deleted

"Turns out that jokes are WAY less funny if people don’t know the context and the delivery is plain text," he continued.

Over the years, Musk has increasingly become seeped into right-wing politics and far right conspiracy theories. He announced his open support for former President Donald Trump after the assassination attempt in July.

While Musk has deleted his own post, he has continued to spread conspiracy theories about the reported Trump assassination attempt. Early Monday morning, after taking his post down, Musk boosted another far right-wing account that questioned why other recent presidents had not experienced assassination attempts.