Mashable

TL;DR: Ready to go back to school? Get ready with this dual-USB-C + USB-A 3.2 high-speed flash drive for just $74.97 (reg. $109.99) through September 3.

As the new school year approaches, it's essential to have the right tools to manage the demands of classes, projects, and extracurriculars. An easy way to share, transfer, save, and expand your digital space is to get a high-speed flash drive to take with you on the go.

The 1TB flash drive is available for just $74.97 through Sept. 3. It's more than just a storage device — it's a productivity powerhouse designed to streamline your workflow and keep you organized, no matter how crazy the semester gets.

One of the standout features of this flash drive is its high-speed transfer capability, thanks to USB 3.2 technology. Whether you're moving large video files, extensive data sets, or a semester's worth of notes, the fast transfer speeds save you valuable time.

Because it has both USB-C and USB-A connectors, it's a plug-and-play drive for nearly any device. This means you don't need a cable or special software to use it. It also means you can save your files from an Android device and upload them onto your Mac with no issue. This could be particularly helpful if you're working on group projects or need to do presentations in your coursework.

Almost every student, at one time or another, faces the dreaded moment when a document is lost. All of that hard work is gone forever. With this flash drive, you can keep backups of all your work to avoid that painful moment. And with 1TB of space, that translates to roughly 200,000 files.

Lightning-fast, waterproof, portable, and easy to use — it's a win all around for any student or professional.

Don't miss this dual-USB high-speed flash drive while it's on sale for just $74.97 (reg. $109.99) through Sept. 3 at 11:59 p.m. PT.

StackSocial prices subject to change.

Opens in a new window Credit: UGR Tech Dual USB-C + USB-A 3.2 High-Speed Flash Drive $74.97 at The Mashable Shop
$109.99 Save $35.02 Get Deal

TL;DR: This user-friendly Function101 button remote for Apple TV (including Apple TV 4K) is available for just $23.97 (reg. $29.95) through September 3.

Apple TV is a great way to access amazing entertainment. But (you knew a but was coming), the remote is not the best part of the experience. It may be the worst part of the experience. It's too sleek and slippery in the hand, and the buttons are flat and not very intuitive. That's why this traditional button remote from Function101 is a definite upgrade to your Apple TV setup. 

This Apple TV button remote, on sale for an affordable $23.97 (reg. $29.95), is ideal for those who miss the simplicity of a more conventional remote. 

It's designed with traditional remote control buttons that are slightly raised for an easier feel and less slippage. The thoughtfully laid-out buttons provide a tactile and intuitive experience, making it easy to find what you're looking for without constantly looking down at the remote.

One of the common pain points with the Siri Remote is its reliance on touch controls, which can lead to accidental swipes and unintended actions. The Function101 remote addresses this issue by offering distinct, physical buttons for essential functions like play, pause, rewind, and fast forward. This design minimizes the chances of missteps, making it a more user-friendly option.

By incorporating infrared (IR) technology, it can also help improve the overall TV-watching experience. This allows you to synchronize the remote with your TV, sound bar, or receiver in seconds, enabling you to control the power, volume, and mute functions directly from the same remote.

Say goodbye to the frustrations of the Siri Remote and enjoy a more straightforward, reliable, and comfortable Apple TV experience.

Don't miss this sale on the Function101 button remote for Apple TV and Apple TV 4K for just $23.97 through Sept. 3.

StackSocial prices subject to change.

Opens in a new window Credit: Function101 Function101 Button Remote for Apple TV/Apple TV 4K $23.97 at The Mashable Shop
$29.95 Save $5.98 Get Deal

Here's what people who weren't there don't know about the moment the dot-com bubble burst: there was no single moment.

The date was different for everyone, and the range varies a lot more than you think. So far as I was concerned, the dot-com economy crashed on the morning of January 11, 2000. That's when I entered the Time-Life building, seething because the Time Warner CEO had just sold our company to AOL, of all internet hellholes, for $183 billion. Just keep your head down, I thought in the elevator, and maybe you won't be asked to cover a deal that insanely overvalues a company you just called "training wheels for the internet."

As I crept into the morning meeting, a voice boomed: "Chris! Let me introduce you to the men you'll be covering this week," said Time magazine editor Walter Isaacson, presenting AOL CEO Steve Case and Time Warner CEO Jerry Levin. Cue forced smiles and clammy handshakes all around.

The vibe shift of the dot-com bubble began in ... January 2000?

The history of financial bubbles, from the South Sea original that suckered in Sir Isaac Newton to the AI implosion of 2024 where a lot of the smartest people in tech seem set to lose their shirts, can be summarized thus: it's all about vibes, man.

Fans of a new technology or financial scheme get so caught up in the potential for exponential profits, they shun nuance and caveats and risk. Irrational exuberance, as we started saying in the 1990s. Stock prices go through the roof, hordes of new investors stampede in. But nuance and caveats and risk are stubborn things, and there's always a moment where society at large starts to see through the illusion: a vibe shift, basically, like the one we're living through now.

Looking back on the decline of the dot-coms, something I witnessed up close in San Francisco and Silicon Valley from March 2000 onwards, two things strike me. First of all, the process was far slower than I thought; we were still very much living in true believer dot-com land for a time in 2001, with all the dumb business models and high-budget launch parties that implied. (Picture a lot of ice sculptures with slow-melting corporate logos; many of these startups were immune to irony.)

SEE ALSO: The early internet kept showing us the future, and we rolled our eyes every time

So it was less a bubble, more a balloon slowly leaking. And here's the second thing I find striking looking back at my diaries of the time: the balloon really seems like it started leaking a lot earlier than March 2000. That's when histories of this quintessential tech collapse place the vibe shift, which makes sense: The NASDAQ, that much-watched index of all things tech, hit its high water mark of 5,084 on March 10, 2000. It would not blast past that number again for 15 years.

But in the first two weeks of the year, a couple of events (or non-events) made the tech world seem like a paper tiger in the eyes of many. The year began with a profound sense of relief that the so-called Y2K millennium bug, where legacy software couldn't tell the difference between 1900 and 2000, hadn't produced the predicted global computer meltdown. But relief soon curdled into irrational anger: had all the techies just hyped up the threat in order to bilk us for unnecessary code rewrites? What else could they be lying about?

Topsy turvy tech titans: AOL's Steve Case, Time Warner's Jerry Levin. Credit: Allan Tannenbaum/Getty Images

Then came one of the most topsy-turvy deals in history. On January 10, the AOL-Time Warner deal was announced. But one factor kept getting downplayed in the press, especially by my employers: given that AOL would end up with 55 percent of the resulting company, it was a takeover.

"I almost had to check that it wasn't April 1," I wrote in my diary that day. "It sounded like a bad joke." After AOL CEO Steve Case walked into that Time magazine morning meeting to meet some of his new employees, I had to board a plane for Dulles and interview Case's lieutenants about all the celebrating that had gone on in AOL HQ. None of them could stop grinning at what this CD-pushing internet service provider had just achieved.

SEE ALSO: Dialing up the past: How did the early internet affect the media?

But investors weren't grinning. AOL stock slid on the news. There was something instinctively wrong about this deal. All well and good when the dot-coms were getting eye-popping valuations based on no profits now or potentially ever, but now they're going to leverage them to buy old-school giants who actually make a profit? It was the tail wagging the dog, and it clearly couldn't last.

Spoiler alert: the company has been broken up and sold off since then, most of it to AT&T. Time magazine was eventually sold to Marc Benioff, founder of Salesforce, who in 2000 was obsessed with promoting his company by sending me and other San Francisco journalists packages full of ... chocolate, for some reason.

We saw the crash coming

More than a year ahead of March 2000, you could already find voices in the media who knew what the sky-high valuations signaled. "This is a real bubble and it's going to pop," one tech analyst told Kiplinger's, a financial magazine, in November 1998. "A bit of the air leaked out of what many Wall Street pros call the internet bubble," the New York Times reported in January 1999, quoting a Morgan Stanley analyst: "I promise you, like all bubbles, this bubble will come to a very bad end."

Nobody had cared then. After Y2K and AOL-Time Warner, they started to care. My diary for January 25, 2000, the day my predecessor as San Francisco bureau chief quit to join a dot-com, reveals the mood of the time. "What the site does, I'm still not exactly sure," I wrote. The dot-com-bound journalist had already pitched me, with a line I now imagine being read in the voice of Kendall Roy: "I mean, internet telephony is a dark horse for story of the year. You should totally write about it."

The startup's exact business model, I concluded, "seems less important than the fact that it just got $60 million in VC funding. Who out there cares what most of this dizzying parade of dot-coms do anyway? They make money for papa on IPO day, that's what." Except that particular IPO never happened. Fast forward to 2024, and the site in question advertises itself as "the premier destination for psychic readings by phone or online chat."

(For what it's worth, Morgan Stanley, now a little more irrationally exuberant than it was back in 1999, recently predicted 10 to 15 AI IPOs this year. Whether there's any actual wiggle room left for AI company IPOs in a suddenly unfriendly 2024 landscape, however, remains to be seen.)

Microsoft made the dot-com bust official. But why?

Something else happened in January 2000 that made people uneasy about the tech world: On January 13, the world's richest man handed over the keys of the world's biggest tech company to a guy who would later become famous for dancing like a monkey.

Bill Gates' Microsoft, of course, was the 800-pound gorilla of the time. I'd been covering the company's trial, on antitrust charges, since 1998. It had clearly been stifling innovation in the early internet space, using its Windows desktop dominance as leverage.

"If Microsoft is a monopoly, should we risk angering it?" was one typically weird question I was asked in my first official AOL chat from San Francisco, a kind of proto Reddit AMA, on April 3, 2000.

That was the day U.S. Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson delivered his judgment: Microsoft had violated the Sherman antitrust act. Breaking up the company, as had been done with AT&T in the 1980s, was on the cards. The market sent Microsoft stock tumbling 15 percent in a single day.

It made no sense that this event would be the starting gun for a run on dot-com stocks. If anything, a less powerful Microsoft would allow more upstart tech companies to flourish. But sense, as we've already established, has nothing to do with tech bubbles.

Together with news that the SEC was quietly cracking down on shady dot-com accounting practices, it suddenly felt like "the cops have finally burst in" on Silicon Valley's party, as Bloomberg wrote at the time. The vibe shift began with AOL Time Warner; as of April it was starting to feel irreversible.

The dot-com bubble took its sweet time deflating.

Even after the Microsoft decision, contemporary reports — and investors — were surprisingly tentative.

"Is the dot-com bubble ready to burst?" wondered the San Francisco Examiner on April 5, 2000. In July, the Palm Beach Post quoted an investor who was "not worried about the dot-com bubble bursting." By September, tech pundits generally agreed a dot-com meltdown had happened, but like Bill Gates, didn't think this meant the technology sector as a whole was in a downturn.

Here's the thing about market peaks; you don't see them until they're far in the rearview. In the case of the dot-com market, there were upswings in the meantime. Look at the NASDAQ chart for 2000, and you're not seeing a 1929-style crash. You'll note two giant spikes after March, moments in the summer and fall when the tech index seemed to be heading back to 5000 again. The NASDAQ would not hit its post-bubble low until October 2002.

Note the multiple highs in 2000, and the low in 2002. Credit: Wikimedia

In Silicon Valley, not much felt like it had changed. The IPO market may have cooled, but wasn't expected to stop completely. When I interviewed Larry Page and Sergey Brin for the first Time story on Google in the fall of 2000, I asked how it felt knowing they'd be billionaires soon. (In the end, Google would wait another 5 years before conditions were right for a public offering.)

The most iconic dot-com hot messes clung on for much longer than we remember. Pets.com didn't bite the dust until November 2000 — and that dog puppet of theirs was still making appearances at events in 2002. I'd been using Kozmo.com, a much-mocked Postmates-style service with no delivery fee, to bring me Krispy Kremes and DVDs in New York in December 1999; I was still using it in San Francisco as late as February 2001. Kozmo shut down 2 months later, which turned out to be very good news for my burgeoning waistline.

If the bubble burst in 2000, someone had forgotten to tell the fat-walleted engineers raising everyone's rents. In mid-2000, I reported on a protest by residents of the Mission, San Francisco's historically Hispanic neighborhood, against dot-com employees moving in. A card game called Burn Rate, where players took on the roles of dot-com CEOs weighed down with massive overheads, was all the rage in the city that year.

But it wasn't until 2001 that tech layoffs became a deluge. That was the year I wrote story after story with headlines like "It's grim and dim for the dot-coms" (that one was about companies coping with layoffs and the statewide "brownouts" brought on by California's reliance on the energy scalpers at Enron.)

As AOL Time Warner's own layoffs began to bite, demand for dot-com schadenfreude was never higher. In the second week of September, I was assigned to talk to former dot-com employees for a cover story with the tentative title "living happily with less." The day I had assembled them for dinner, the biggest news of the century broke. Dinner was canceled, and I was never asked to write a dot-com story again.

Tech rebounded faster than expected.

After the all-consuming catastrophe of 9/11, attention for tech news was in short supply. And that, ironically, was when the tech world got really interesting.

In October 2001, Steve Jobs handed me and other journalists the first generation iPod. But the tech world's stock was so low in New York, I had to fight for a single page in Time on the MP3 player that seemed so clearly like a game-changer — especially once I saw how fast my parents figured out how to use it.

That was the story of tech in 2001: without so much dot-com froth in the way, the future suddenly became much clearer.

The Google guys kept talking about a groundbreaking product, not yet called AdSense, and how it would actually extract that much-promised revenue from the internet. I wrote about Reed Hastings, a former AI researcher who'd quit in frustration at the slow pace of his chosen field. His company Netflix and its DVD-by-mail product seemed promising (I didn't focus so much on the long-term "deliver movies over the internet" plan; been there, heard that). Jeff Bezos, whom I'd pitched as Person of the Year two years prior, spent a day in Seattle trying to convince me that Amazon's business model would work in the long run.

Apple, Google, Amazon, and Netflix? All 2001 needed to complete the future lineup of the five tech giants was a programming prodigy who was then still in boarding school. Only in 2002 would he arrive at Harvard, where inspiration waited in the form of a dorm room face book.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes" — so wrote another San Francisco journalist, one who repeatedly lost his shirt on startups, at the turn of a previous century. History isn't exactly about to repeat itself with the 2024 correction. But we can at least hope that the final line of this dot-com-AI stanza — the one where the strongest companies emerge, battle-hardened and ready to launch new revolutions — will be a couplet for the ages.

There's supposedly nothing special about a blue moon. A full moon is just a moon phase, and a blue moon is just a designation for certain full moons — the ones timed to fall before the end of a month that already had one full moon.

True, unless it's like the bizarro blue moon we're getting in August of 2024, which deserves a fuller explanation.

SEE ALSO: Why landing a spaceship on the moon is still so challenging Why is August's full moon considered a blue moon?

August's single full moon gets its "blue" designation from how many full moons fit in a "tropical year." Typically this means 12, but the current tropical year has 13. And the extra one gets counted as blue. If you find that unsatisfying — perhaps because it's totally arbitrary and based on concepts like "tropical year" that you didn't even know existed before today — well, I'm not sure I can help, but I can offer a little more detail.

According to the Library of Congress website, the Maine Farmers’ Almanac's moon math was derived from that irksome concept I mentioned earlier, the "tropical year," which runs not Jan. 1 through Dec. 31, but from each winter solstice (which happens around Dec. 21-22) to the next. The year 2024, however, as counted by the "tropical year," contains four summer moons. The third full moon in a four full moon season — which can't be the midsummer moon nor late summer moon — becomes a blue moon.

By this system, the summer of 2024 has three full moons with seasonal designations, and a bonus blue moon:

1. June 21 - Early Summer Moon

2. July 21 - Midsummer Moon

3. August 19 - Blue Moon

4. September 17 - Late Summer Moon

Now you know the core logic of what one might call an original blue moon (as if any of this can be considered "logical").

The moon as captured by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Credit: NASA / GSFC / Arizona State University Why are there two types of blue moon?

Actually there are three, because the moon can literally appear blue after a major volcanic eruption, but let's focus on the ways blue moons are counted on calendars.

The reason you tend not to hear about original blue moons is that the exciting world of full moon tallying was thrown into disarray in 1946 when James Hugh Pruett, writing for Sky & Telescope, fumbled the Almanac's definition, incorrectly stating that a blue moon was simply the second full moon in a month. You might call this a "fool's blue moon," another term I just coined. James Hugh Pruett's type of blue moon tabulation caught on, and the blue moon chaos has never dissipated.

So no, nothing about the moon itself is scientifically notable this month. Claiming that certain full moons are "blue" by tradition is a 20th century phenomenon that, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, came along well after the phrase "once in a blue moon." The moon won't appear blue (barring any volcanic eruptions), and none of this impacts astronomers, astronauts, lunar beings, or even werewolves. This is, however, a boom time for pedantic trivia junkies.

It's worth noting that August 2023 also had a blue moon by the other, more popular definition, and two consecutive Augusts, both with blue moons is another rarity, arbitrary or not. According to Space.com, the next blue moon under the more popular blue moon regime will occur in May 2026, while the next original blue moon won't be for another five years, when it will fall in, yep, August of 2029.

How can I see the blue moon?

Look up.

We geeks are a passionate bunch. We'll happily spend hours dissecting the latest superhero movie or Star Wars series, but ask us to decode dating signals, and we're lost. Our love language might be quoting obscure anime, and our idea of a perfect date might involve tabletop games, but finding someone who gets that? That's a challenge.

For nerdy women, dating means sifting through profiles of guys who think "gamer girl" is a personality (or creeps chasing their Manic Pixie Dream Elf-girl fantasy). For men, it's the struggle to express your love for all things nerdy without scaring off potential partners or, worse, being labeled "that guy."

SEE ALSO: The best dating apps for introverts who prefer books to bars Is there a dating site for geeks?

Yes, but you don't need a niche dating site made exclusively for geeks to find your soulmate.

"For folks looking for a partner that shares their same nerdy interests and passions, the best thing to do is to join a platform with a robust algorithm like eharmony, and include your specific interests in your profile," Kiana Reeves, Somatic Sex Educator, Intimacy Coach, and Chief Education Officer at Foria, tells Mashable. "You can also opt for a platform more frequented by young people, like Bumble, Tinder, and Hinge, and make sure your bio and photos indicate your interests and values — this will help you more easily sift through and attract potential matches who are interested in the same things."

The top dating sites and apps to try Credit: Ian Moore / Mashable

You might notice we no longer recommend geek-specific sites like Soul Geek, Gamer Dating, and Dating for Muggles). Sadly, these platforms haven't kept up with the times and are feeling a bit... well, dated. (You can get the full scoop in our 'How we tested' section below.) So, which apps and dating sites are worth trying?

We've got you covered. We compared the internet's top dating sites, trendy swiping apps, and geek-specific platforms to pinpoint the ones where you can proudly fly your nerd flag. With the best dating sites for geeks, you might just find that special someone who shares your obscure passions. We're talking about someone who'll happily debate the merits of Pokémon Emerald vs. Scarlet/Violet or create the perfect couples cosplay for the next Comic-Con. The best part? These platforms are all easily accessible via the App Store and Google Play Store.

Just remember this: Even if a potential match doesn't share your specific hobby or interest, they could still be the right partner for you. Don't fall for this common geek relationship fallacy. The most important thing is that they respect your nerdy obsessions, and you respect theirs.

SEE ALSO: Dating predictions for the rest of 2024

Here are our top picks for the best dating sites for geeks, nerds, and anyone with a passion for their niche hobbies can find love:

If you're reading this, you're looking for a little help playing Strands, the New York Times' elevated word-search game.

By providing an opaque hint and not providing the word list, Strands creates a brain-teasing game that takes a little longer to play than its other games, like Wordle and Connections.

SEE ALSO: NYT Connections today: See hints and answers for August 11 SEE ALSO: Wordle today: Here's the answer hints for August 11

If you're feeling stuck or just don't have 10 or more minutes to figure out today's puzzle, we've got all the NYT Strands hints for today's puzzle you need to progress at your preferred pace.

NYT Strands hint for today’s theme: Home stretch?

The hint for the theme is that they aren't always counted in the square footage.

Today’s NYT Strands theme plainly explained

The answers are related to exterior spaces attached to homes.

NYT Strands spangram hint: Is it vertical or horizontal?

Today's NYT Strands spangram is horizontal.

NYT Strands spangram answer today

Today's spangram is BonusSpaces.

NYT Strands word list for August 11

• Deck

• Patio

• Veranda

• BonusSpaces

• Sunroom

• Balcony

• Terrace

Looking for other daily online games? Find one you might like – or hints for another game you're already playing – on Mashable's Games page.

TL;DR: Through Sept. 3, take advantage of end-of-summer savings and get a lifetime license for PDF Converter Pro for just £19.61 (reg. £78.53).

Opens in a new window Credit: Acethinker PDF Converter Pro: Lifetime License £19.61 at the Mashable Shop
£78.53 Save £58.92 Get Deal

No matter what your field, document management can be a huge hassle, not to mention the frustration of opening and editing PDFs. Gift yourself a simplified solution on sale today.

This month, professionals can get a lifetime subscription to PDF Converter Pro for just £19.61, on sale now through Sept. 3. This is a cost-effective tool for streamlining your workflow.

PDF Converter Pro is meant for students and professionals who work with PDFs and other digital files often, including bankers, lawyers, teachers, and real estate agents. It allows users to convert files from and to the PDF format. This means you can convert a PDF file to an Excel, Word, JPEG, PowerPoint, HTML, or other file so you can save, backup, or edit its contents. 

It also has the option to convert a file format to a PDF for transfer. Because of the integrated OCR technology, it's designed to let you extract text from image-based PDF documents, including the original format and graph.

Other useful features include merging PDF files into a single PDF, image extraction, splitting files, and compressing. To protect your data, you also have the ability to enter a password to encrypt your PDF.

The versatility of PDF Converter Pro could make this a time-saving tool for anyone who needs to manage and adapt their documents for different purposes.

If you're looking for a way to enhance your productivity, take advantage of this summer sale and make this converter a part of your digital toolkit. Get the PDF Converter Pro lifetime license for just £19.61 (reg. £78.53) when you order through Sept. 3 at 11:59 p.m. PT. No coupon needed.

StackSocial prices subject to change.

Oh hey there! If you're here, it must be time for Wordle. As always, we're serving up our daily hints and tips to help you figure out today's answer.

If you just want to be told today's word, you can jump to the bottom of this article for August 11's Wordle solution revealed. But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

Where did Wordle come from?

Originally created by engineer Josh Wardle as a gift for his partner, Wordle rapidly spread to become an international phenomenon, with thousands of people around the globe playing every day. Alternate Wordle versions created by fans also sprang up, including battle royale Squabble, music identification game Heardle, and variations like Dordle and Quordle that make you guess multiple words at once. 

Wordle eventually became so popular that it was purchased by the New York Times, and TikTok creators even livestream themselves playing.

Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Wordle.

What's the best Wordle starting word?

The best Wordle starting word is the one that speaks to you. But if you prefer to be strategic in your approach, we have a few ideas to help you pick a word that might help you find the solution faster. One tip is to select a word that includes at least two different vowels, plus some common consonants like S, T, R, or N.

What happened to the Wordle archive?

The entire archive of past Wordle puzzles used to be available for anyone to enjoy whenever they felt like it. Unfortunately, it has since been taken down, with the website's creator stating it was done at the request of the New York Times.

Is Wordle getting harder?

It might feel like Wordle is getting harder, but it actually isn't any more difficult than when it first began. You can turn on Wordle's Hard Mode if you're after more of a challenge, though.

SEE ALSO: NYT's The Mini crossword answers for August 10 SEE ALSO: NYT Connections today: See hints and answers for August 10 Here's a subtle hint for today's Wordle answer:

British pastry.

Does today's Wordle answer have a double letter?

There are no reoccurring letters.

Today's Wordle is a 5-letter word that starts with...

Today's Wordle starts with the letter S.

SEE ALSO: Wordle-obsessed? These are the best word games to play IRL. The Wordle answer today is...

Get your last guesses in now, because it's your final chance to solve today's Wordle before we reveal the solution.

Drumroll please!

The solution to today's Wordle is...

SCONE.

Don't feel down if you didn't manage to guess it this time. There will be a new Wordle for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we'll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.

Reporting by Caitlin Welsh, Sam Haysom, Amanda Yeo, Shannon Connellan, Cecily Mauran, Mike Pearl, and Adam Rosenberg contributed to this article.

Connections is the latest New York Times word game that's captured the public's attention. The game is all about finding the "common threads between words." And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier—so we've served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle.

If you just want to be told today's puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for August 11's Connections solution. But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

What is Connections?

The NYT's latest daily word game has become a social media hit. The Times credits associate puzzle editor Wyna Liu with helping to create the new word game and bringing it to the publications' Games section. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common.

Tweet may have been deleted

Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there's only one correct answer. If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake—players get up to four mistakes until the game ends.

Tweet may have been deleted

Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media.

SEE ALSO: NYT's The Mini crossword answers for August 11 Here's a hint for today's Connections categories

Want a hit about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try:

• Yellow: Big boats

• Green: Icon of the game

• Blue: In reference to

• Purple: Sounds like a body part

Featured Video For You Connections: How to play and how to win Here are today's Connections categories

Need a little extra help? Today's connections fall into the following categories:

• Yellow: Large Boat

• Green: All-time Great

• Blue: Regarding

• Purple: Homophones of Body Features

Looking for Wordle today? Here's the answer to today's Wordle.

Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions.

Drumroll, please!

The solution to today's Connections #427 is...

What is the answer to Connections today

• Large Boat: BARGE, CRAFT, SHIP, VESSEL

• All-time Great: BEST, CHAMP, GOAT, LEGEND

• Regarding: ABOUT, CONCERNING, ON, TOWARD

• Homophones of Body Features: HARE, I, MUSSEL, NAVAL

Don't feel down if you didn't manage to guess it this time. There will be new Connections for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we'll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

Is this not the Connections game you were looking for? Here are the hints and answers to yesterday's Connections.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.

Disney's biennial D23 expo has followed hot on the heels of some surprises at San Diego Comic-Con in July — an event that saw the return of Robert Downey Jr. to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. How do you one up that announcement? With lots and lots of new ones.

SEE ALSO: Disney+ will actually crack down on password sharing next month

Day one of the weekend event saw the return of several Disney classics like The Incredibles, Toy Story, and Frozen. And between Disney Animation Studios, Pixar, Marvel, and Star Wars, there was something for everyone. That's why we rounded up every announcement, trailer, teaser, remake, and more so you don't have to miss a thing.

SEE ALSO: Disney+ will actually crack down on password sharing next month Moana 2

Kicking off the entertainment showcase was the official trailer for Moana 2. Set three years later, Moana and demigod trickster Maui team up once again to face a new threat to Oceania.

It seems Disney has plans for Moana to be its new flagship Disney Princess, because, on top of the sequel, we're also getting a live-action remake. That has already started production and can be expected in 2026. However, you can catch Moana 2 on November 27, 2024.

Snow White

This one has been in production hell and subject to some intense controversy since filming wrapped up in 2022. However, the release of the live-action remake of Disney's 1937 classic is finally on the horizon.

The teaser trailer gives us our first looks at Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot as Snow White and the Evil Queen respectively, along with its heavily-CGI'd world. This one hits theaters on March 21, 2025.

First look at Stitch in the live-action remake of Lilo & Stitch Tweet may have been deleted

Lilo & Stitch is another classic Disney film that no one really asked for a live-action remake of, but we're getting one anyway. Given Disney's visual effects track record when it comes to anthropomorphic animals, our first look at Stitch is exactly what one would expect, which boils down to "yep, that's him alright."

Beyond that initial teaser at D23, it was also announced that this adaptation of the 2002 cult classic will get a Summer 2025 release.

Incredibles 3 announcement Tweet may have been deleted

With Fantastic 4 getting some love as of late, it makes sense that the family film franchise inspired by Marvel's First Family is announced to be making its return. Helmed by long-time writer and director of the series Brad Bird, Incredibles 3 was announced as in production at Pixar.

No further details have been provided outside the announcement. It should be noted that Incredibles 2 was the highest-grossing animated film of all time until Inside Out 2 took the throne.

Toy Story 5 teaser

Speaking of beloved animated Pixar movies that ... maybe should've ended two films ago, fans at D23 got a small teaser for Toy Story 5. According to director Andrew Stanton, Woody, Buzz, and the gang will be fighting to stop their new child from becoming an iPad kid.

“This time around, it’s toy meets tech," Stanton said at D23. "It’s going to be fun, and we can’t wait for you all to see it in the summer of 2026."

Frozen 3 Tweet may have been deleted

Oscar-winning film Frozen is set to get its third movie in the franchise sometime in 2027, according to its creator Britney Lee. There was also a small teaser shown to guests at D23 that showed Elsa and Anna riding a white horse and a brown stag.

Beyond that, it was also announced that after the release of Frozen 3, there are plans for a Frozen 4.

Zootopia 2 Tweet may have been deleted

Oh, look, another sequel. This time, it's for the hit Disney film Zootopia, which saw bunny cop Judy Hopps blackmail fox con artist Nick into helping her solve a crime.

The duo is back again with Oscar-winner Ke Huy Quan as a snake named Gary. The casting of Quan was the big news regarding this announcement, but fans of the series can expect this to hit theaters around Thanksgiving of next year.

Star Wars: Skeleton Crew

Skeleton Crew is set during the New Republic era, the years after Return of the Jedi, and based on its plot synopsis, will be about four kids lost in the galaxy trying to make their way home. Jude Law is also set to make his debut in the galaxy far, far away, this time as a force user named Jod Na Nawood.

We also got a first look at what the suburbs look like in the Star Wars universe. Based on the trailer shown at D23, this show is heavily inspired by classic Steven Spielberg films like E.T. and Hook.

Star Wars: Skeleton Crew premieres on Disney+ on Dec. 3.

Agatha All Along

A new trailer for the WandaVision sequel series Agatha All Along hit the stage at D23, along with a performance of an original song, "The Ballad of the Witches Road."

Kathryn Hahn will reprise her role as the witch Agatha Harkness and is joined in the show by costars Joe Locke, Patti LuPone, Aubrey Plaza, Sasheer Zamata, Ali Ahn, and Debra Jo Rupp.

The show will follow Hahn in the aftermath of WandaVision having to face a "magical gauntlet of trials" along the Witches Road as she seeks to gain her powers back.

The first two episodes of Agatha All Along will premiere on Disney+ on September 18.

The Fantastic Four: First Steps snippet

Fans at D23 got an exclusive sneak peek at the initial teaser trailer for Marvel's The Fantastic Four: First Steps starring Pedro Pascal (Reed Richards/Mr. Fantastic), Vanessa Kirby (Sue Storm/The Invisible Woman), Joseph Quinn (Johnny Storm/The Human Torch), and Ebon Moss-Bachrach (Ben Grimm/The Thing). This didn't stop fans from recording it and posting it across social media though, and it can easily be found by searching.

The trailer is the same one shown at SDCC last month and is made from lots of test footage and conceptual previsualization reels. Still, what Marvel has on hand now with filming still ongoing is pretty impressive.

Alongside the all-star cast as Marvel's First Family, the film will also star Julia Garner (Ozark) as the Silver Surfer's lover Shalla-Bal, and Ralph Ineson (The Witch, The First Omen) as the world-devouring entity Galactus. Paul Walter Hauser, Natasha Lyonne, and John Malkovich will also co-star in undisclosed roles.

The Fantastic Four: First Steps is set to release on July 25, 2025.

Daredevil: Born Again snippet

Alongside Fantastic Four, Marvel's Daredevil: Born Again sequel series also had its exclusive trailer leaked on the internet by phone-happy fans. Feel free to search, because we won't be embedding the trailer for this one here either.

Serving as a continuation of the beloved Netflix Daredevil, Charlie Cox and his co-stars Vincent D'Onofrio (Kingpin), Deborah Ann Woll (Karen Page), and Elden Henson (Foggy Nelson) all return to make their official debuts into the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

The trailer shown at D23 was jam-packed with surprises such as the return of Jon Bernthal's Punisher and Wilson Bethel's Bullseye. Alongside them was our first look at the costumed vigilante White Tiger.

There's no official trailer yet, but the show is set to release on Disney+ on March 1, 2025.

Avatar 3 is now Avatar: Fire and Ash Tweet may have been deleted

After the smash success of Avatar: The Way of Water, it makes sense that its planned follow-up film will be all about fire. Director James Cameron and stars Sam Worthington and Zoe Saldaña took took the stage to reveal the official title to the next film in the franchise, Avatar: Fire and Ash.

While no official details of the sequel were revealed, Cameron did show attendees concept art from the film showing the Ash People of the Na'vi and their otherworldly masks — taking clear inspiration from traditional Native American ghost dances.

The planned release date for Fire and Ash is December 19, 2025, but if you can't wait and want some Na'vi lore to fill the gap, check out Massive Entertainment's Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora video game.

Freaky Friday 2 is now Freakier Friday Tweet may have been deleted

While there aren't a lot of details about this film, stars Lindsay Lohan and Jamie Lee-Curtis appeared on stage to announce that Freaky Friday 2, the sequel to the 2003 film, will officially be titled Freakier Friday.

According to a Disney press release, the sequel sees the return of mother-daughter duo Tess and Anna Coleman (Curtis and Lohan respectively) as Anna and her daughter prepare to marry into a new family.

Also returning in Freakier Friday from the original cast are Mark Harmon, Chad Michael Murray, Christina Vidal Mitchell, Haley Hudson, Lucille Soong, Stephen Tobolowsky, and Rosalind Chao.

Freakier Friday is set to release sometime in 2025.

Tron: Ares

Finally to cap off this round-up of D23's entertainment showcase was the reveal and first look at the third film in the Tron franchise, Tron: Ares.

Jeff Bridges once again returns to the series set in the world inside a computer mainframe. Co-starring alongside Bridges are Evan Peters, Greta Lee, and Jared Leto as the titular Ares, a highly sophisticated AI sent to the real world for an undisclosed mission. It was also revealed that Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross' band Nine Inch Nails will be composing the film's soundtrack.

Tron has become one of the unlikeliest films to get a third film considering the 1982 film and 2010's Tron: Legacy had disappointing box office returns. However, we won't complain about getting more.

Tron: Ares is set to release on October 10, 2025.

UPDATE: Aug. 10, 2024, 12:42 p.m. EDT This story has been updated to add four new Windows laptop picks: The Microsoft Surface Laptop 7, the Lenovo Legion 9i, the Lenovo Yoga 9i (gen 9), and the HP Omnibook X.

The best Windows laptops run an impressive gamut, from 2-in-1s with new Qualcomm hardware to dual-display stunners and liquid-cooled gaming stations. (Some of them, dare we say, will tempt even the most devoted Apple Macbook disciples.) Users who need a new laptop for everyday productivity, creativity, or entertainment have no shortage of options. And that's for better or worse.

To help you pick out your next PC from the crowded Windows market, we've broken out our best laptops rundown into this separate guide to the best Windows machines of 2024. All of these laptops have been rigorously hands-on tested by Mashable staff members or contributors for performance and build quality, and we stand by their value (or at least think they're worth finding on sale).

SEE ALSO: The 9 best laptops of 2024, tested by Mashable staff

Read on to learn more about our favorite models, including four new picks: The Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 is our new favorite Windows laptop for most people (unseating the HP Spectre x360 14), and the Lenovo Yoga 9i (Gen 9) is our new top 2-in-1 machine. The HP OmniBook X 14 is now the best mid-range Windows laptop we've tried. And finally, the Lenovo Legion 9i (Gen 9) is the gaming laptop we like most — but you should try to find it on sale.

FYI: We've listed the pricing and specs of our testing units, which may not apply to each laptop's base model.

Disney's 'Moana 2' trailer expands on the lore of the original

'Snow White' teaser trailer sees Gal Gadot and Rachel Zegler in the spotlight

There are a million ways for a sport to make its debut at the Olympics, but breaking probably had the most interesting one. Breaking or breakdancing made its official Paris Olympics debut on Friday with Japan's Ami Yusa taking the Gold over 16 other B-girls.

However, the B-girl that stole the show wasn't Nicka, the small Lithuanian woman wearing a durag, but 36-year-old Australian university lecturer Rachael Gunn, better known by her stage name Raygun. As an academic, he research focuses on, yep, breakdancing.

Tweet may have been deleted

Despite going 0-3 against her opponents and failing to score a single point during the day's event, Raygun has become a viral hit and much-needed source of memes in the backdrop of ridiculous culture war shenanigans on Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter).

Tweet may have been deleted Tweet may have been deleted Tweet may have been deleted Tweet may have been deleted Tweet may have been deleted

For her part though, Gunn has committed to being herself despite the virality. In an interview with the Guardian, the breaker told the outlet "I wanted to move differently, be artistic and creative because how many chances do you get that in a lifetime to do that on an international stage."

Tweet may have been deleted Tweet may have been deleted Tweet may have been deleted Tweet may have been deleted

The Mini is a bite-sized version of The New York Times' revered daily crossword. While the crossword is a lengthier experience that requires both knowledge and patience to complete, The Mini is an entirely different vibe.

With only a handful of clues to answer, the daily puzzle doubles as a speed-running test for many who play it.

So, when a tricky clue disrupts a player's flow, it can be frustrating! If you find yourself stumped playing The Mini — much like with Wordle and Connections — we have you covered.

SEE ALSO: NYT Connections today: See hints and answers for August 10 SEE ALSO: Wordle today: Here's the answer hints for August 10

Here are the clues and answers to NYT's The Mini for Saturday, August 10, 2024:

AcrossBerkeley school, for short

• The answer is Cal.

Erin Brockovich has one in the movie "Erin Brockovich"

• The answer is Cameo.

"Whoops, I forgot about that"

• The answer is Oh right.

Longtime comic strip with anthropomorphic animals, with "The"

• The answer is Farside.

Disc for disc golf

• The answer is Frisbee.

Narcissist's problem

• The answer is Ego.

On the ___ (running away from capture)

• The answer is Lam.

Stimpy's cartoon pal

• The answer is Ren.

Stammering syllables

• The answer is ERs.

DownFare eaten by scavengers

• The answer is Carrion.

Not quite right

• The answer is Amiss.

Clear to read, as handwriting

• The answer is Legible.

Listing on a credit card statement

• The answer is Charge.

"My goodness!"

• The answer is Oh dear.

Hoped-for outcome of a job interview

• The answer is Offer.

Abounds (with)

• The answer is Teems.

Featured Video For You The Wordle Strategy used by the New York Times' Head of Games Featured Video For You The Wordle Strategy used by the New York Times' Head of Games Featured Video For You The Wordle Strategy used by the New York Times' Head of Games

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.

Black holes are misunderstood.

They're almost inconceivably dense objects, which grants them immense gravitational power. (If Earth was hypothetically crushed into a black hole, it would be under an inch across.) Not even light can escape, if it falls in. But black holes aren't incessantly sucking up everything in space like a vacuum cleaner (if so, we'd likely be in one). Things have to pass nearby to be affected. The black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy, for example, isn't eating much.

Yet 23 million light-years from us, the colossal black hole at the center of the spiral galaxy NGC 4258 is ravenously eating. The powerful James Webb Space Telescope snapped an image of this galactic event, which you see below.

"At its heart, as in most spiral galaxies, is a supermassive black hole, but this one is particularly active," the European Space Agency, which built the telescope with NASA and the Canadian Space Agency, said in a statement.

SEE ALSO: NASA scientist viewed first Voyager images. What he saw gave him chills.

Although black holes themselves don't emit light, the blazing hot material around them does. Most stuff in a black hole's orbit gets shredded apart and spins rapidly around the black hole, forming a super-hot, donut-like "accretion disk." As this cosmic dust and gas relentlessly spins around, it shoots light and energy into space. Importantly, some of this cosmic material can also rapidly plummet down into the black hole, where it travels at extreme speeds, heating up and producing glowing light.

That's the vivid glow you see at the center of the spiral galaxy below. And amid the light, you can see innumerable little pinpoints of light, each a distant star.

Clearly, this supermassive black hole is ingesting lots of cosmic cuisine. But once this glowing material passes the final boundary between space and the black hole, called the "event horizon," no more light is emitted. It's passed the point of no return.

The core of galaxy NGC 4258 is generating bright vivid light as material falls into the central supermassive black hole. Credit: ESA Webb / NASA / CSA / J. Glenn Tweet may have been deleted

Also clearly visible in the galaxy, an object also known as "Messier 106," are two sprawling green outflows, which are made of hot gas. "They are likely caused by outflowing material produced by the violent churning of gas around the black hole, creating a phenomenon analogous to a wave crashing up out of the ocean when it hits a rock near the shore," the space agency explained.

The spiraling reddish-orange regions are similar to the dust and star-filled spirals of our own Milky Way galaxy. Out here, our sun and solar system lie far from the galactic center on one of the Milky Way arms. "We live in the suburbs of our galaxy," explains NASA.

The Webb telescope's powerful abilities

The Webb telescope is designed to peer into the deepest cosmos and reveal new insights about the early universe. But it's also peering at intriguing planets in our galaxy, along with the planets and moons in our solar system.

Here's how Webb is achieving unparalleled feats, and likely will for decades to come:

- Giant mirror: Webb's mirror, which captures light, is over 21 feet across. That's over two-and-a-half times larger than the Hubble Space Telescope's mirror. Capturing more light allows Webb to see more distant, ancient objects. As described above, the telescope is peering at stars and galaxies that formed over 13 billion years ago, just a few hundred million years after the Big Bang. "We're going to see the very first stars and galaxies that ever formed," Jean Creighton, an astronomer and the director of the Manfred Olson Planetarium at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, told Mashable in 2021.

- Infrared view: Unlike Hubble, which largely views light that's visible to us, Webb is primarily an infrared telescope, meaning it views light in the infrared spectrum. This allows us to see far more of the universe. Infrared has longer wavelengths than visible light, so the light waves more efficiently slip through cosmic clouds; the light doesn't as often collide with and get scattered by these densely packed particles. Ultimately, Webb's infrared eyesight can penetrate places Hubble can't.

"It lifts the veil," said Creighton.

- Peering into distant exoplanets: The Webb telescope carries specialized equipment called spectrographs that will revolutionize our understanding of these far-off worlds. The instruments can decipher what molecules (such as water, carbon dioxide, and methane) exist in the atmospheres of distant exoplanets — be they gas giants or smaller rocky worlds. Webb looks at exoplanets in the Milky Way galaxy. Who knows what we'll find?

"We might learn things we never thought about," Mercedes López-Morales, an exoplanet researcher and astrophysicist at the Center for Astrophysics-Harvard & Smithsonian, told Mashable in 2021.

Already, astronomers have successfully found intriguing chemical reactions on a planet 700 light-years away, and have started looking at one of the most anticipated places in the cosmos: the rocky, Earth-sized planets of the TRAPPIST solar system.

Perhaps surprisingly, the majority of stars in the galaxy are not sun clones but smaller orbs of gas and plasma known as red dwarfs, about half the size of Earth's star. 

Astronomers have had their sights set on these stars as tantalizing places to look for habitable worlds for a while now. Not only are they the most populous stars, but their planets are easier to study from a practical standpoint. Current atmosphere-detecting methods work best when planets orbit fairly close to their stars in space. Red dwarf stars' relatively cooler temperatures present an opportunity for worlds to be closer without getting fried. 

Despite red dwarfs' potential, no one knows for sure whether their worlds can have atmospheres, or what chemicals could be within their air. 

Scientists will soon begin to answer those questions with the James Webb Space Telescope, a partnership of NASA and its European and Canadian counterparts. A new large-scale program will budget about 500 hours for observing rocky exoplanets orbiting small red stars, specifically to search for atmospheres. 

Though the survey is designated for Webb's fourth research cycle, which starts next July, observations may begin sooner, said Néstor Espinoza, an astronomer heading the program's implementation team. 

"This is one of those high-risk, high-reward programs," he told Mashable. "Imagine that for all of the targets, we detect atmospheres. Then you answer the question, 'Yes, atmospheres are very common around these stars. That means maybe life can emerge.' On the other hand, if you found out that none of them have atmospheres, that would be pretty sad, but also pretty interesting. It would mean that our planetary system is actually really, really special."

SEE ALSO: The strange new worlds scientists have discovered this year Many exoplanet scientists believe if life exists on other worlds, humanity will likely find it first on a rocky world orbiting a red dwarf star. Credit: NASA / JPL / Ames Research Center / Daniel Rutter illustration

Most astronomers agree that detecting atmospheres is crucial in the quest for habitable worlds. NASA has playfully called Earth's own atmosphere its "security blanket": Without it, the type of life flourishing here wouldn't exist. This cocoon holds oxygen in the air and filters out harmful ultraviolet radiation from the sun, all while keeping our world warm. Furthermore, it creates pressure that allows liquid water to pool on the surface.

Scientists have found signs of atmospheres surrounding many of the 5,700 exoplanets discovered so far, but all of them have been around gas giant planets, like Jupiter, with air mostly made of hydrogen. The hunt for a more terrestrial world swaddled in a protective atmosphere has so far eluded astronomers, though Webb has recently helped scientists find some reasonable bets, such as 55 Cancri e, GJ 486 b, and LHS 1140 b.

Jennifer Lotz, who directs Webb and Hubble's operations at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, recently decided to initiate the rocky exoplanet survey using the director's discretionary time, in the same way revolutionary science campaigns like the Hubble deep field images came to fruition. In addition to Webb's work, the new survey will include about 250 orbits of ultraviolet observations by the Hubble telescope to help characterize the red dwarf stars' activity. 

In addition to Webb, the new survey will include about 250 orbits of ultraviolet observations by the Hubble telescope. Credit: Adrian Mann / Stocktrek Images / Getty Images illustration

Hubble will play a pivotal role in revealing whether one of these terrestrial worlds could even hold onto an atmosphere so close to a star that's constantly bombarding it with radiation.

"It's a beautiful message to put out there," Espinoza said. "People think Webb is the successor to Hubble, but that's not really true. They complement each other. It's kind of the perfect dream team to do this job." 

"It's kind of the perfect dream team to do this job." Secondary eclipse technique

Since Webb opened for business, researchers have frequently used a technique called transmission spectroscopy to study exoplanets. When these worlds cross in front of their host star, starlight gets filtered through their atmospheres. Molecules within the atmosphere absorb certain light wavelengths, or colors, so by splitting the light into its basic parts — like a rainbow — astronomers can detect what light segments are missing to discern the molecular makeup of an atmosphere.

But that method has had its drawbacks. If the starlight were completely uniform, that would be one thing, but red dwarf stars, also known as M dwarfs, can get stellar spots just like the sun, causing variability in the signals. This problem, called stellar contamination, has recently led Webb scientists to embrace another technique, known as secondary eclipse observations. 

Secondary eclipse spectroscopy, shown in the diagram above, eliminates the so-called 'stellar contamination' problem. Credit: NASA / ESA / CSA / Dani Player / Andi James / Greg Bacon diagram

With secondary eclipses, it's a game of hide-and-seek. Scientists measure the signals of the red dwarf and planet when the planet is at the star's side. Then, when the planet's orbit takes the world behind the star, scientists collect the star's light signal alone. By subtracting the star from the total, the researchers can then isolate the light coming from just the planet. Teams will use a particular wavelength filter that can detect carbon dioxide, thought to be a likely atmospheric ingredient.

Scientists will also take thermal measurements to get an early sense of whether an atmosphere could be present. If the temperature is lower than expected, it's a strong indication that a thick atmosphere is distributing energy from the planet's dayside — the hemisphere facing the star — to the nightside. 

Webb's Survey of Rocky Worlds

The new campaign will allow scientists to survey 10 to 20 rocky worlds, with an emphasis on planets between 200 and 450 Kelvin. For comparison, Earth is 288 Kelvin, or an average 59 degrees Fahrenheit. Most of the targets will be less than twice the size of Earth. The Space Telescope Science Institute will put out a call for advisers to help determine the target list.

Astronomers discovered the TRAPPIST-1 system, a family of tightly packed planets swarming a red dwarf star, about seven years ago. Credit: Mark Garlick / Science Photo Library / Getty Images illustration

For Kevin Stevenson, an astrophysicist at Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, the wishlist would include GJ 486 b, a world he has previously studied, and LTT 1445 A b, one of the nearest strong cases for having air. He believes the Webb campaign will advance humans' understanding of rocky worlds by a decade. 

"This survey program will be the next major step towards answering the question, 'Are we alone?'" Stevenson said in an email. "Without an atmosphere, it’s hard to see how life, at least as we know it, can survive on a planet." 

"This survey program will be the next major step towards answering the question, 'Are we alone?'"

If most M-dwarf-orbiting planets turn out not to have an atmosphere, then a future instrument, the Habitable Worlds Observatory, becomes all the more important in the search for life beyond this solar system, he said. The Hubble-esque telescope is expected to focus on terrestrial worlds orbiting sun-like stars. 

But a breakthrough could have a huge impact on how Webb and other flagship observatories are used going forward, said Sarah Moran, an exoplanet scientist at the University of Arizona's Lunar and Planetary Laboratory.

"If the program is able to conclusively determine that one of these rocky worlds around an M dwarf star has an atmosphere, it could really set the stage not only for the rest of JWST's science operating lifetime," she said in an email, "but also maybe that of the next great observatory."

Somewhere in the galaxy, an advanced alien civilization might harness energy from its star.

And NASA wants to know if it could detect this activity.

The space agency has some powerful telescopes — and it's building more. As scientists increasingly peer at other rocky, Earth-like worlds, they evaluated whether it's possible to pick up signs of widespread solar farms on such distant planets. After all, an extraterrestrial society will need power, and a sun-like star provides nearly inexhaustible energy for billions of years. Human civilization, for example, has advanced from largely burning wood to using coal, and now increasingly uses modernized energy sources like solar power.

"We propose it's a natural technological evolution that an advanced civilization could make," Ravi Kopparapu, a NASA planetary scientist who led the research published in the Astrophysical Journal, told Mashable.

SEE ALSO: NASA scientist viewed first Voyager images. What he saw gave him chills.

Solar panels — made from silicon, which is abundant in the universe — are highly reflective. This makes vast solar arrays a potentially attractive target for NASA, which seeks to identify if life, whether microbial or complex, might exist on planets beyond our solar system (called exoplanets).

The researchers asked whether a large space telescope, like the developing Habitable Worlds Observatory, would be able to detect such solar farms on a world as far as some 30 light-years away (which is many trillions of miles but still relatively close-by — the Milky Way is around 100,000 light-years across). Dubbed the "super-Hubble," the Habitable Worlds Observatory would pack a mirror some six meters (nearly 20 feet) across; the legendary Hubble telescope has a mirror 2.4 meters (7.8 feet) across.

On Earth, the researchers estimate humanity could meet all its energy needs (with energy storage, of course) by covering around two and a half percent of the surface with solar panels. And if the population hypothetically ballooned to 30 billion, this would mean nine percent of land cover. But how much of the surface of a distant exoplanet might need to be blanketed in these reflective arrays to be detectable? The team ran simulations of how a "super-Hubble" could view these far-off solar panel technosignatures, and found a whopping 23 percent of an Earth-like world's surface would need coverage.

"That's huge," Kopparapu said.

And it's perhaps an unlikely scenario from our species' point of view — though as noted below, perhaps not so for another species. What's more, another civilization simply might not need to generate copious amounts of energy, making sprawling energy-creating solar farms or structures unnecessary. Another civilization could have highly efficient technologies, or a low population. This would make widespread solar panel coverage unlikely.

"A civilization may not need as much energy as we think," Kopparapu said.

A conceptual graphic of what the Habitable Worlds Observatory may look like as it peers into the cosmos. Credit: NASA Scientific Visualization Studio An artist's conception of an exoplanet harboring a technologically advanced civilization. Credit: NASA / Jay Freidlander

Yet it's conceivable that an intelligent species on a rocky desert world like Mars may choose to cover a significant swath of its landmass with solar panels. It could view that as the best renewable energy option, especially on a world that might lack much hydroelectric generation. Or it could have reasons we can't imagine.

"We can't judge what a civilization's motives are," Kopparapu noted.

"We can't judge what a civilization's motives are."

Beyond solar panels, some scientists have for decades mused about the possibility of megastructures that surround a star, harnessing immense amounts of stellar energy. Of course, these behemoth energy harvesters, called Dyson Spheres, might not be the most pragmatic approach for the technologically advanced.

"Surely a society that can place enormous structures in space would be able to access nuclear fusion or other space-efficient methods of generating power," Vincent Kofman, a NASA research scientist who also worked on this technosignature study, noted in an agency statement. (Humanity is on the hunt to make nuclear fusion energy — though realizing this technology is a long, long way off.)

A conception of the TRAPPIST-1 solar system, which contains seven rocky worlds, located some 40 light-years from Earth. Some could be habitable. Credit: NASA / JPL-Caltech

Future telescopes, like the Habitable Worlds Observatory, will sleuth for a number of possible signs of life — and research like this informs scientists of what they might look for. They'll look for signs of pollution, atmospheric ingredients produced by life, and perhaps other forms of technology. Though it currently appears that detecting solar panels is implausible, it can't be ruled out. In the search for potential civilizations — which may be quite rare in any galaxy or maybe not exist — almost anything is possible.

Who knows what the large, powerful instruments will detect, many light-years away.

"They might even find city lights," Kopparapu said.

Over the last few years, I’ve tried a lot of skincare products. While I loved the viral Solawave red light therapy wand, I pride myself in having a healthy dose of skepticism when it comes to skincare products and devices, but the NuFACE Trinity+ had me excited (and nervous) to put this celeb-favorite to the test. I’ve dabbled in microcurrent devices in the past, but trying something is a lot different than sticking with something over the long term. 

And when the thing you’re trying is almost $400? I was obviously skeptical. 

How does the NuFACE work? 

The NuFACE Trinity+ is an FDA-cleared facial toning device that uses microcurrent technology to help “lift, contour, and tighten” the face, giving a more toned and contoured look — at least according to NuFace’s website. The device works by emitting a low-level electrical wave that’s supposed to mimic the body’s bio-electrical field to help smooth and strengthen facial muscles, stimulate collagen production, reduce fine lines and wrinkles, and even promote lymphatic drainage. 

And according to research, it actually works pretty well. Not only do fans of the NuFACE show jaw-dropping before and after results on TikTok, but one study found that microcurrent technology used for 20 minutes for 30 consecutive sessions was actually effective at reducing wrinkles around the forehead area.

With three different levels of intensity, the Trinity+ also features a “boost” button that increases the intensity of the microcurrent whenever you want to give an area some extra love. The device also adds Bluetooth connectivity, allowing users to connect to the NuFACE app and unlock exclusive tutorials, custom reminders, and a “selfie tracker” to monitor results. The sturdy plastic device is also customizable, allowing users to pop off the metal top and replace it with additional attachments like NuFace’s red light therapy attachment or the lip and eye area attachment. 

The NuFACE Trinity+ comes with the microcurrent attachment, but others are available as a separate purchase. Credit: RJ Andersen / Mashable Using the NuFACE for the first time 

Not gonna lie, waiting for the NuFACE Trinity+ to charge felt like torture. I’d been eager to try the device after first seeing it on Instagram back in 2019, and I wanted it to be worth the hype. Once it was ready, I watched a few tutorials on the NuFace website and jumped right in.

NuFACE recommends cleaning your face first with an oil-free cleanser, drying your skin thoroughly, then applying either their Aqua Gel or Silk Crème Activator in a thick, “mask-like” layer to the area you’re going to treat. After that, it’s time to turn on the device, set it to your desired intensity, and place it against your skin before gliding it upward with light to medium pressure.

I started with NuFACE’s five-minute facial tutorial, which recommended starting with your neck and gradually moving the device upward in separate strokes before repeating the process over the desired area three times. All in all, it took me a little longer than five minutes to complete, and — aside from a slight tingling sensation in certain areas — it was pretty much painless.

I kinda hated the NuFACE at first

While I noticed a slight improvement in the tightness of my skin, especially below my cheeks, I didn’t notice a massive difference after my first NuFACE treatment. My face did feel a little sore afterward, especially around my cheeks and jawline, and everything just felt a little off for the next hour or so. I kept using the device daily — NuFACE recommends using it five days a week for the first two months, then switching to two to three days for maintenance — but the odd sensations convinced me to stop using the device after a few days.

A couple of weeks later, I decided to give the NuFACE one more try. I’d read some reviews from users who didn’t use the NuFACE on their necks (something the company recommends if you have any thyroid issues), and — while I haven’t had any thyroid problems in the past — I wanted to see if it made a difference, and it absolutely did. 

SEE ALSO: TheraFace PRO is the ultimate 'it girl' skincare tool

I cautiously restarted my routine, ready to toss the NuFACE if it caused any more issues, and started noticing slight improvements to my skin’s elasticity the longer I used it. Everything felt a little more taut, my face looked more defined, and — while my cheekbones still felt a bit sore after using the device — a quick trip to Google gave me a surprising answer. As it turns out, research shows that microcurrent technology can be used to help reduce sinus pain, and the FDA had even approved the use of another microcurrent device for the treatment of sinus congestion — something I’d struggled with for years. Obviously, I’m not a doctor, nor can I conclusively say that the NuFACE produced the same results as an FDA-approved device. However, my lack of sinus headaches was definitely a nice perk, regardless of whether they were eliminated by the NuFACE or placebo effect.

The NuFACE won me over

Here’s the thing, I actually like the NuFACE. I’ve had the device for a few months now, and I have definitely noticed an improvement in my face when I’m using it. I’m a little less puffy, my cheeks are more defined, and I like the idea of giving my facial muscles a mini workout a few times a week. 

That being said, I’m on the fence about whether or not it’s worth the $395 price tag. On the upside, it worked. A single charge lasted for a surprisingly long time, it was easy to use, and I felt like it did more to lift and tighten my face compared to other microcurrent devices I’d tried in the past. 

On the other hand, I had some issues. I didn’t love using either of the activator products, and I quickly found out that aloe vera was a much more affordable alternative. Plus, the NuFACE companion app didn’t feel super useful, and I struggled with the Bluetooth connectivity feature on the NuFACE Trinity+ so much that I stopped using the app entirely. And while I eventually sorted out my initial problems with the device, I haven’t really kept up with using the device long-term. I’ll break it out for a few days when I’m feeling puffy or insecure, and it does make a difference, but — like going to the gym — your results fade without consistency. 

Is the NuFACE worth it?

For some people, the NuFACE might be worth the investment, especially if you’re a diehard skincare aficionado who has mastered the art of sticking to a routine or you’re tired of splurging on microcurrent facials. However, if you’re more into casual skincare, it might not be the right device for you. Based on my experience, I’d also recommend talking to your doctor or dermatologist before trying the NuFace if you have any sinus or thyroid issues because, unlike the phrase goes, beauty should not be pain.

And if you’re on the fence like I was, you can always opt for the NuFACE Mini instead. It’s smaller, cheaper, and lacks the option to swap out different attachments. And, considering the additional attachments are $160 each, that’s not the worst idea for beauty fans on a budget. 

All in all, I like the NuFACE Trinity+, and I’ll probably keep using it occasionally. I can definitely see why it’s a holy grail product for some people, and — while I don’t think it’s one of mine — it might be one of yours.

NuFACE Trinity+ $395.00 at Dermstore
Shop Now

TL;DR: Learn how to use ChatGPT, Gemini, DALL-E, and more AI tools with this $24.97 (reg. $790) online learning bundle on sale.

You deserve a personal assistant, but unless you’re Elon Musk, you probably can’t afford one. AI might just be the next best thing. It can help you write a good resume, brainstorm ideas for your blog, or generate logos for your business, all for next to nothing or free.

Not sure how to use AI or where to start? These online courses are an excellent place to begin, and they’re on sale for $24.97 (reg. $790) for a limited time.

Transform your workflow with new tips and tricks

You might start by learning ChatGPT, one of the most widely used AI chatbots on the web. GPT-3.5 is the free version you can access online, like through your web browser. You’ll interact with it just like you would Google. Try asking it for help with your resume (though it can’t get you a coffee). 

The course shows you techniques for using the chatbot, like how to phrase your prompt to get the best responses. You’ll quickly learn that AI tools have limitations; for example, no matter how often you ask Gemini (Google’s AI) not to do something, it may do it anyway (we’re speaking from experience here). 

Generating logos with AI

Your instructor, Eduonix Learning Solutions, also covers generating AI images and logos with DALL-E. Instead of having to hire a designer or try your hand at creating your own, you could see what AI comes up with for your business. You might be surprised with how much you like its creation.

With tools for both writing and graphics, you could get assistance for creating whole articles, social media posts, or presentations. However, the key word here is assistance — everything AI-generated should go past a human editor.

Make your dream AI personal assistant come to life with this ChatGPT, Gemini, and DALL-E training bundle, only on sale for $24.97 (reg. $790) for a little while longer.

StackSocial prices subject to change.

Opens in a new window Credit: Eduonix Learning Solutions The 2024 Complete ChatGPT & Gemini AI Advanced E-Degree $24.97 at The Mashable Shop
$790.00 Save $765.03 Get Deal