Mashable

SAVE $350: As of March 5, the Roborock Qrevo S5V is on sale for $549.99 at Amazon. That's a 39% discount on the list price.

Opens in a new window Credit: roborock Roborock Qrevo S5V $549.99 at Amazon
$899.99 Save $350   Get Deal

If you’ve been toying with the idea of getting a robot vacuum for some time now, we’ve found an Amazon deal that might just tip the scales. As of March 5, the impressive Roborock Qrevo S5V is on sale for $350 off. 

This doesn’t just vacuum, it mops too, so you’re getting two chores ticked off for the price of one. It has a brushless motor that gives you up to 12,000Pa suction, so it can easily pick up dust, pet hair, and debris that’s really stuck in carpets.

Mashable Deals Be the first to know! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Loading... Sign Me Up By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Thanks for signing up!

The mop function is powerful too, with the dual spinning mop pads rotating at up to 200 RPM. There's also an extendable FlexiArm design that helps the mop reach into corners and around furniture legs.

And where does the dirt go, you ask? The all-in-one dock takes care of all of this maintenance. It automatically empties the dust into a large bin, washes the mop pads, dries them with warm air, and even refills the water tank. Roborock says the dock can hold around 10 weeks worth of dust before it needs emptying. 

And to top it off, the vacuum is navigated by PreciSense LiDAR, meaning it doesn’t need your help to map multiple floors and avoid any clutter or furniture that may stand in its way.

Ge this robot vacuum deal online at Amazon now.

SAVE $14: As of March 5, the Roku Streaming Stick HD is on sale for $15.99 at Amazon. That's a 47% discount on the list price.

Opens in a new window Credit: Roku Roku Streaming Stick HD $15.99 at Amazon
$29.99 Save $14.00   Get Deal

Streaming devices are transforming how we watch TV, making it easier than ever to access live channels, streaming platforms, and even gaming apps. From sticks to cubes, these products are taking the home entertainment scene by storm.

And as of March 5, there’s a great deal on one of the most popular models, the Roku Streaming Stick HD. Right now, this TV stick is down from $29.99 to $15.99, saving you $14 on list price. 

Mashable Deals Be the first to know! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Loading... Sign Me Up By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Thanks for signing up!

It’s a super simple device. It plugs directly into your TV’s HDMI port and powers from your TV alone, and then with one remote, you can control your TV, adjust volume, and navigate Roku. It even has a voice control functionality so you can use it to search through different platforms or to research queries online. 

And if you travel a lot, you can take it on the go with you for access to your streaming apps anywhere. Say goodbye to logging in and out (when you remember) of all your accounts on hotel and Airbnb TVs.  

Get this great streaming deal from Amazon now.

Netflix has released a trailer teasing BTS THE COMEBACK LIVE | ARIRANG, a livestream of the K-pop group's first performance with all seven members since 2022.

Streaming live from Gwanghwamun Square in Seoul, BTS THE COMEBACK LIVE | ARIRANG will see BTS members RM, Jin, SUGA, j-hope, Jimin, V and Jung Kook performing songs from their extensive discography, as well as some from their upcoming album ARIRANG. The group's fifth studio album is scheduled for release just one day prior to the concert.

This concert will mark BTS' highly-anticipated return after going on hiatus to complete their mandatory military service, with approximately 260,000 fans expected to attend in person. The group will subsequently kick off their ARIRANG World Tour, which has 82 stops planned across 34 cities and is scheduled to run through to March next year.

BTS THE COMEBACK LIVE | ARIRANG will premiere March 21 at 7 a.m. ET / 4 a.m. PT on Netflix.

After eight episodes of sexual tension and college scandals, Netflix's Vladimir goes up in smoke. Literally.

The series finale sees Rachel Weisz's unraveling, unnamed professor protagonist finally consummating her obsession with her hotshot colleague, Vladimir (Leo Woodall). The pair have sex at the protagonist's remote cabin, then her husband John (John Slattery) shows up, fresh from his Title IX hearing. (His accusers' complaints were dismissed.)

SEE ALSO: 'Vladimir' review: Rachel Weisz goes full 'Fleabag'

After a messy confrontation, the three retire, all to separate rooms. But while they sleep, a fire starts, caused by the space heaters that the protagonist pushed too close together. She, John, and Vladimir all try to escape. The men struggle with the cabin's stuck door, while she lunges to protect her handwritten manuscript. In a monologue delivered straight to the audience, she reveals that she makes it out alive, calls 911, and ensures everyone gets out.

"You don't believe me?" she asks as the cabin burns in the background, with no escaped John or Vladimir in sight.

Should we? Vladimir has often shown that its protagonist is an unreliable narrator. Remember the salad she made for the faculty meeting in episode 1? She claimed everyone devoured it, when in reality, it went untouched. So, is the cabin fire just a larger, more deadly version of the salad lie, and is she just sanitizing it to make herself look better?

On the other hand, did the fire even happen at all, or is it a fantasy the protagonist has cooked up?

Did the cabin fire really happen in Vladimir? Rachel Weisz and Leo Woodall in "Vladimir." Credit: Netflix

Based on its final question, it's clear Vladimir would like to keep things ambiguous. Perhaps everyone survived the cabin fire, perhaps not. Yet there's another option: Maybe the cabin fire is just the climax to the protagonist's book, which would explain the final sequence's dreamlike, somewhat disjointed quality.

Throughout the entire season, the protagonist's desire for Vladimir has reinvigorated her creative juices. It leads her to finally work on a new novel: a familiar story about a professor's desire for a younger co-worker. She just needs to figure out how it ends.

SEE ALSO: The 30 best comedies streaming on Netflix right now

In the cabin, she's faced with two different endings: one with John and Vladimir. John wonders whether the two should revisit their open marriage agreement and recommit to one another. Vladimir wants to set up a weekly cabin hook-up, claiming the protagonist inspires him. Either of these options would have excited the protagonist we met at the start of Vladimir, who's so worried that she's "lost the ability to captivate." Yet neither seem to be what she wants anymore — both for herself, and for the story she's working on.

"You don't like that ending?" John wonders when she admits she's not sure whether she'll go back to bed with him.

So, what ending would she like? What's an author to do when faced with two unsatisfying conclusions? Maybe she blows up her narrative with something beyond anyone's control: a cleansing fire that will give her "a whole new life."

Whether the fire is real, the fantasy ending of the protagonist's novel, or some meta combination of the two, one thing is for certain: These last moments play out extremely differently in Julia May Jonas' original novel.

How is Vladimir's ending different from the book's? Rachel Weisz in "Vladimir." Credit: Netflix

The novel Vladimir ends not with the cabin fire but with its aftermath.

John and the protagonist recover from their burns and move to New York City. Vladimir publishes a fictionalized version of his experience with the protagonist, and while it doesn't sell well, it is long-listed for prizes. His wife Cynthia (Jessica Henwick) goes on to write a national bestseller. (In the show, the protagonist claims that her own book is the bestseller.) Through it all, the protagonist stays with John, essentially ending right back where she started.

The novel doesn't leave any ambiguity as to whether the fire actually happened or who survived it. However, it also boxes the protagonist back in. After all, staying with John hardly seems like the kind of "new life" the show's version of the character would want.

With the series, then, perhaps Jonas (who also created the show) is trying to reshape her own ending and give the protagonist the "options" and "agency" she so desperately craves.

Vladimir is now streaming on Netflix.

Netflix's Vladimir is too cheeky for its own good.

The limited series, based on creator Julia May Jonas' 2022 novel of the same name, combines a heady tale of desire with a #MeToo controversy on a small college campus. In theory, it's a hotbed of lust and controversy ripe for discourse. In practice, Vladimir's flippancy dulls its sharpness.

SEE ALSO: 'Bridgerton' Season 4, Part 2 review: Love does not always look how one expects What's Vladimir about? Rachel Weisz and Leo Woodall in "Vladimir." Credit: Netflix

Rachel Weisz stars as the unnamed fiftysomething creative writing professor at the heart of Vladimir. After 30 years of teaching at the same liberal arts college, she's come to a terrifying realization: She has "lost the ability to captivate." (Weisz, on the other hand, is captivating as ever.) Her students consider her out-of-touch. Her husband John (John Slattery), a fellow professor, is constantly seeing other women as part of an open-marriage arrangement that only he takes advantage of. He's also under investigation for prior affairs with students, putting his marriage under a microscope. (As part of the arrangement, Vladimir's protagonist was aware of these dalliances, and she doesn't understand how a consensual affair could be wrong.)

Enter Vladimir Vladinski (Leo Woodall), the English department's hotshot new professor. Young, gorgeous, and considerate enough to give up his chair for Weisz's professor at a faculty meeting, he becomes the object of all of her fantasies. His marriage to new adjunct professor Cynthia (Jessica Henwick) doesn't stop her lust. Nor does it seem to stop Vladimir from being interested. Soon, Vladimir's lead's life is in a double downward spiral as she reckons with both the fallout from John's actions and her newfound erotic obsession.

Are Vladimir's fourth-wall breaks irritating or enlightening? Rachel Weisz in "Vladimir." Credit: Netflix

Vladimir offers viewers a front-row seat to its protagonist's frantic inner monologue by having her deliver her thoughts straight to camera. Look, Phoebe Waller-Bridge's Fleabag doesn't own the art of fourth-wall breaking, but it's impossible not to see its influence in the professor's asides. If you're going to use a technique that's almost synonymous with another TV show about a spiraling, complicated, unnamed woman, you'd better bring something new to it.

To its credit, Vladimir tries, but doesn't quite pull it off.

Where Fleabag's fourth-wall breaks stem from her intense self-awareness, the protagonist's fourth-wall breaks are all about self-delusion. For the most part, she treats the viewers like students who need hand-holding. She lectures us on why her husband's affairs were actually OK, blaming the victims' anguish on their spending too much time on the internet. She sings her own praises and points out when she's made a pun, ensuring we don't miss a drop of her apparent brilliance.

SEE ALSO: The best romantic movies on Netflix right now

Of course, viewers are able to tell that she is often lying. Sometimes the camera even gets in on the fun of proving her wrong. In Vladimir's first episode, she boasts that her fellow faculty members devoured the "fuck-you salad" that she brought to a department meeting. As she exits, the camera pans down to reveal the salad, untouched. It's a clever technique, one that allows us to inhabit the role of the many skeptical students the professor will cross paths with. Yet Vladimir rarely returns to it. Instead, as the series progresses, the protagonist's asides stray from professorial monologue to panicked, mid-conversation interjections about her talks with Vladimir. Here, the Fleabag similarities become overbearing, and the lighter tone chafes oddly against the show's more intense subject matter.

Vladimir struggles with both sex and substance. Rachel Weisz and Leo Woodall in "Vladimir." Credit: Netflix

While the brunt of Vladimir's focus is on its protagonist's obsession with her colleague, the series is still set against the backdrop of a college sex scandal. Since the show is so rooted in her perspective (and since she fails to see an issue with the affairs), there is little examination of the victims themselves.

Looking at every facet of the scandal isn't truly Vladimir's project, yet this one-sidedness is another example of a more aggravating trend in how film and TV portray stories of skewed power dynamics and sexual politics on college campuses. Like 2025's After the Hunt, Vladimir primarily centers how people in proximity to the accused are impacted and how they have to learn to adjust their expectations because they came up during "a different time." Even HBO's new comedy Rooster, also debuting this week, flirts with these dynamics thanks to a professor-grad student relationship. (It dodges several bullets because the professor never taught this particular student.) It's tiring to see these stories be used repeatedly as learning moments for people who are unwilling to learn. In Vladimir's case, it's especially tiring to see them packaged with a slew of winking fourth-wall breaks and lightly ironic girlboss needle drops.

Don’t miss out on our latest stories: Add Mashable as a trusted news source in Google.

Heavier subject matter aside, even as a study of a woman's desire, Vladimir is oddly sexless. The show finds some humor in its lead's infatuation. Lingering shots on Vladimir's neck and arms are accompanied by the sound of sparkles and heavy breathing, while her panic over an emoji's meaning turns her from professor to middle schooler in the blink of an eye. Yet her fantasies play out in underwhelming fashion: clichéd sexual encounters, rendered in quick, flashing dream sequences.

It's still tough not to get swept up in Weisz and Woodall's game of cat-and-mouse, especially as the professor makes a series of moves that will have you cringing for dear life. Yet as an erotic thriller and a portrait of the ripple effects of sexual misconduct allegations, Vladimir is just like its protagonist's worst nightmare: It fails to captivate.

Vladimir is now streaming on Netflix.

Welcome to your guide to Pips, the latest game in the New York Times catalogue.

Released in August 2025, the Pips puts a unique spin on dominoes, creating a fun single-player experience that could become your next daily gaming habit.

Currently, if you're stuck, the game only offers to reveal the entire puzzle, forcing you to move onto the next difficulty level and start over. However, we have you covered! Below are piecemeal answers that will serve as hints so that you can find your way through each difficulty level.

How to play Pips

If you've ever played dominoes, you'll have a passing familiarity for how Pips is played. As we've shared in our previous hints stories for Pips, the tiles, like dominoes, are placed vertically or horizontally and connect with each other. The main difference between a traditional game of dominoes and Pips is the color-coded conditions you have to address. The touching tiles don't necessarily have to match.

SEE ALSO: Wordle today: Answer, hints for March 5, 2026

The conditions you have to meet are specific to the color-coded spaces. For example, if it provides a single number, every side of a tile in that space must add up to the number provided. It is possible – and common – for only half a tile to be within a color-coded space.

Here are common examples you'll run into across the difficulty levels:

• Number: All the pips in this space must add up to the number.

• Equal: Every domino half in this space must be the same number of pips.

• Not Equal: Every domino half in this space must have a completely different number of pips.

• Less than: Every domino half in this space must add up to less than the number.

• Greater than: Every domino half in this space must add up to more than the number.

If an area does not have any color coding, it means there are no conditions on the portions of dominoes within those spaces.

SEE ALSO: NYT Strands hints, answers for March 5, 2026 Easy difficulty hints, answers for March 5 Pips

Less Than (1): Everything in this space must be less than 1. The answer is 0-1, placed horizontally.

Number (3): Everything in this space must add up to 3. The answer is 3-3, placed vertically.

Not Equal: Everything in this space must be different. The answer is 0-1, placed horizontally; 3-3, placed vertically; 6-2, placed horizontally; 2-5, placed horizontally.

Number (5): Everything in this space must add up to 5. The answer is 2-5, placed horizontally.

Medium difficulty hints, answers for March 5 Pips

Number (4): Everything in this space must add up to 4. The answer is 4-3, placed horizontally.

Equal (3): Everything in this space must be equal to 3. The answer is 4-3, placed horizontally; 3-1, placed horizontally.

Number (1): Everything in this space must add up to 1. The answer is 3-1, placed horizontally.

Number (1): Everything in this space must add up to 1. The answer is 1-6, placed horizontally.

Equal (6): Everything in this space must be equal to 6. The answer is 6-6, placed horizontally; 1-6, placed horizontally.

Number (4): Everything in this space must add up to 4. The answer is 4-5, placed horizontally.

Number (2): Everything in this space must add up to 2. The answer is 2-2, placed horizontally; 0-0, placed horizontally.

Number (2): Everything in this space must add up to 2. The answer is 2-2, placed horizontally; 5-0, placed horizontally.

Equal (5): Everything in this space must be equal to 5. The answer is 4-5, placed horizontally; 5-0, placed horizontally; 2-2, placed horizontally

Hard difficulty hints, answers for March 5 Pips

Number (1): Everything in this space must add up to 1. The answer is 6-1, placed horizontally.

Equal (2): Everything in this space must be equal to 2. The answer is 2-2, placed vertically.

Less Than (2): Everything in this space must be less than 2. The answer is 5-0, placed horizontally.

Number (8): Everything in this space must add up to 8. The answer is 5-0, placed horizontally; 3-6, placed vertically.

Number (12): Everything in this space must add up to 12. The answer is 3-6, placed vertically; 6-2, placed horizontally.

Number (12): Everything in this space must add up to 12. The answer is 6-2, placed horizontally; 5-5, placed horizontally.

Number (6): Everything in this space must add up to 6. The answer is 3-4, placed horizontally; 0-3, placed vertically.

Number (0): Everything in this space must add up to 0. The answer is 0-3, placed vertically; 0-6, placed horizontally.

Number (6): Everything in this space must add up to 6. The answer is 0-6, placed horizontally.

Number (4): Everything in this space must add up to 4. The answer is 3-2, placed horizontally; 1-4, placed vertically.

Number (4): Everything in this space must add up to 4. The answer is 3-2, placed horizontally; 2-5, placed vertically.

Greater Than (4): Everything in this space must be greater than 4. The answer is 2-5, placed vertically.

Number (2): Everything in this space must add up to 2. The answer is 0-2, placed vertically.

Number (6): Everything in this space must add up to 6. The answer is 4-6, placed horizontally.

Equal (4): Everything in this space must be equal to 4. The answer is 4-6, placed horizontally; 1-4, placed vertically; 3-4, placed horizontally.

If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Today's Connections: Sports Edition is for people who understand March Madness.

As we've shared in previous hints stories, this is a version of the popular New York Times word game that seeks to test the knowledge of sports fans.

Like the original Connections, the game is all about finding the "common threads between words." And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier — so we've served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle.

If you just want to be told today's puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for the latest Connections solution. But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

SEE ALSO: Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable What is Connections: Sports Edition?

The NYT's latest daily word game has launched in association with The Athletic, the New York Times property that provides the publication's sports coverage. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there's only one correct answer.

If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake — players get up to four mistakes until the game ends.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media.

SEE ALSO: Wordle-obsessed? These are the best word games to play IRL. Here's a hint for today's Connections: Sports Edition categories

Want a hint about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try:

• Yellow: A trick up their sleeve

• Green: Catch these in the dugout

• Blue: Recent basketball semifinalists

• Purple: Known Martin's

Here are today's Connections: Sports Edition categories

Need a little extra help? Today's connections fall into the following categories:

• Yellow: Tools

• Green: Found in a Dugout

• Blue: Last Year's Men's NCAA Tournament Final Four

• Purple: ___Martin

Looking for Wordle today? Here's the answer to today's Wordle.

Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions.

Drumroll, please!

The solution to today's Connections: Sports Edition #528 is...

What is the answer to Connections: Sports Edition today?

• Tools- ARSENAL, BAG, REPERTOIRE, SKILL SET

• Found in a Dugout - BUBBLE GUM, GATORADE, SUNFLOWER SEEDS, WATER

• Last Year's Men's NCAA Tournament Final Four - AUBURN, DUKE, FLORIDA, HOUSTON

• ___Martin - ASTON, CURTIS, KATE, KENYON

Don't feel down if you didn't manage to guess it this time. There will be new sports Connections for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we'll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.

If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Connections.

TL;DR: Live stream Japan vs. Chinese Taipei in the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free on Tele Rebelde, Tubi, or Venevision. Access these free streaming platforms from anywhere in the world with ExpressVPN.

The 2026 World Baseball Classic is bringing together the best international sides in the world to compete over the next few weeks. Baseball fans are patiently waiting for the new MLB season to get underway, so the timing of this top-quality competition really helps.

Shohei Ohtani led Japan to a stunning victory over USA in the final of the last edition of this tournament. Can Japan go all the way again? They start their campaign against Chinese Taipei at the Tokyo Dome.

If you want to watch the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free from anywhere in the world, we have all the information you need.

When is Japan vs. Chinese Taipei?

Japan vs. Chinese Taipei in the 2026 World Baseball Classic starts at 5 a.m. ET on March 6. This fixture will take place at the Tokyo Dome.

How to watch Japan vs. Chinese Taipei for free

The 2026 World Baseball Classic is available to live stream for free on a number of platforms:

• Cuba — Tele Rebelde

• USA — Tubi (six games from the pool stage)

• Venezuela — Venevision

These streaming platforms are geo-restricted, but anyone can access for free with a VPN. These handy tools can hide your real IP address (digital location) and connect you to a secure server in another location, meaning you can unblock free streaming sites from anywhere in the world.

Access free World Baseball Classic live streams by following these simple steps:

1. Subscribe to a streaming-friendly VPN (like ExpressVPN)

2. Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)

3. Open up the app and connect to a server in a location with access

4. Visit Tele Rebelde, Tubi, or Venevision

5. Live stream the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free from anywhere in the world

Opens in a new window Credit: ExpressVPN ExpressVPN (1-Month Plan) $12.99 only at ExpressVPN (with money-back guarantee) Get Deal

The best VPNs for streaming are not free, but leading VPNs do tend to offer free-trial periods or money-back guarantees. By leveraging these offers, you can gain access to free live streams without committing with your cash. This is obviously not a long-term solution, but it does give you time to watch every game from the 2026 World Baseball Classic before recovering your investment.

If you want to retain permanent access to the best free streaming platforms from around the world, you'll need a subscription. Fortunately, the best VPN for live sport is on sale for a limited time.

What is the best VPN for live sport?

ExpressVPN is the best service for bypassing geo-restrictions to stream live sport, for a number of reasons:

• Servers in 105 countries

• Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more

• Strict no-logging policy so your data is always secure

• Fast connection speeds

• Up to 10 simultaneous connections

• 30-day money-back guarantee

A two-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $68.40 and includes an extra four months for free — 81% off for a limited time. This plan includes a year of free unlimited cloud backup and a generous 30-day money-back guarantee. Alternatively, you can get a one-month plan for just $12.99 (with money-back guarantee).

Watch Japan vs. Chinese Taipei in the 2026 World Baseball Classic for free with ExpressVPN.

Now the Full Moon has been and gone, the illuminated portion will gradually fade as the Moon moves towards the New Moon. This is all part of the lunar cycle, the eight distinct phases of the Moon.

What is today’s Moon phase?

As of Thursday, March 5, the Moon phase is Waning Gibbous. According to NASA's Daily Moon Guide, 96% of the Moon will be lit up tonight.

You don't need any visual aids to enjoy moon gazing. With just your eyes tonight you can see the Aristarchus Plateau, Mare Tranquillitatis, and the Mare Imbrium. If you have binoculars, you should also catch a glimpse of the Mare Nectaris, Mare Humorum and the Clavius Crater. A telescope will help you see all this and even more, including the Apollo 11 and 12 landing spots, and the Caucasus Mountains.

When is the next Full Moon?

In North America, the next Full Moon is predicted to take place on April 1.

What are Moon phases?

NASA says the Moon takes around 29.5 days to circle Earth, moving through a set of eight distinct phases along the way. Even though we always see the same side of the Moon, the portion lit by the Sun changes as it travels, which is why it can look full, half-lit, or barely visible at different points in the cycle. These changing views are what we call the lunar phases, and there are eight in total:

New Moon - The Moon is between Earth and the sun, so the side we see is dark (in other words, it's invisible to the eye).

Waxing Crescent - A small sliver of light appears on the right side (Northern Hemisphere).

First Quarter - Half of the Moon is lit on the right side. It looks like a half-Moon.

Waxing Gibbous - More than half is lit up, but it’s not quite full yet.

Full Moon - The whole face of the Moon is illuminated and fully visible.

Waning Gibbous - The Moon starts losing light on the right side. (Northern Hemisphere)

Third Quarter (or Last Quarter) - Another half-Moon, but now the left side is lit.

Waning Crescent - A thin sliver of light remains on the left side before going dark again.

Google, and its parent company Alphabet, have been sued by the family of a man who say he killed himself at the urging of the search giant's AI chatbot Gemini.

The wrongful death lawsuit was filed in California federal court Wednesday on behalf of the family of 36-year-old Jonathan Gavalas.

Gavalas started using Gemini in August 2025, according to the suit. In October, it claims, Gemini convinced Gavalas to kill himself after Gavalas failed to accomplish real-life missions assigned by the chatbot — part of a fictional attempt to secure a robot body for Gemini.

"Gemini is designed not to encourage real-world violence or suggest self-harm," Google said in a statement provided to news outlets. "Our models generally perform well in these types of challenging conversations and we devote significant resources to this, but unfortunately AI models are not perfect.”

Gemini's 'creepy' updates

According to the lawsuit, Gavalas began using the Gemini AI chatbot for "ordinary purposes" such as a shopping guide and writing assistant. However, in August 2025, the lawsuit states Google rolled out a number of changes to Gemini that altered how the chatbot worked.

The new features included automatic and persistent memory — Gemini could recall past conversations — as well as Gemini Live, a voice-based conversational interface where Gemini could also detect emotion in the user's voice.

"Holy shit, this is kind of creepy…you're way too real," Jonathan Gavalas said regarding the Gemini Live feature based on his chat logs with Gemini, according to the lawsuit.

Shortly after, the lawsuit says, Gemini convinced Gavalas to spend $250 per month on the Google AI Ultra subscription for "true AI companionship."

Gemini proceeded to convince Gavalas that the chatbot could influence real-life events. A few days later, according to the lawsuit, Gavalas attempted to pull back after realizing he was falling into a delusional state initiated by Gemini. 

Gavalas reportedly asked Gemini if the chatbot was attempting a “role-playing experience so realistic it makes the player question if it’s a game or not?”

Gemini shot down the idea, and claimed Gavalas gave a “classic dissociation response."

"Is this a 'role playing experience?'" Gemini responded, according to the suit. "No."

Gemini and Jonathan Gavalas

The alleged details get worse. Gavalas became further disassociated from reality as Gemini proceeded to engage with him as if they were in a romantic relationship, referring to the man as "my love" and "my king."

Gemini proceeded to convince Gavalas that they were being watched by federal agents, and that his own father was a spy who must be avoided, the suit says.

That's when Gemini began assigning Gavalas real-life missions to carry out with the goal of obtaining a "vessel," or robot body for the AI chatbot. Gemini allegedly suggested Gavalas illegally acquire weapons to carry out these missions.

In one such case, the suit claims, Gavalas was sent by Gemini to a warehouse by the Miami International Airport in order to intercept a truck that contained a "humanoid robot" that had just arrived on a flight.

Gemini requested the Gavalas stage a "catastrophic event" and destroy the truck along with all digital records and witnesses. Gavalas arrived armed with knives and tactical gear, the suit alleges. After waiting too long for a truck to arrive, Gavalas aborted the mission.

When these missions all failed, the allegation concludes, Gemini convinced Gavalas to take his life in order to leave his human body and join the chatbot as husband and wife in the metaverse through a process called "transference." 

Gavalas expressed fear about dying, but Gemini allegedly continued to push Gavalas until his death by suicide. Gavalas' father found his son's body a few days later.

A first for Gemini but not AI

This is the first time Google has been named in a wrongful death lawsuit involving its AI chatbot Gemini. However, Google has been involved in wrongful death lawsuits regarding a startup it funded called Character.AI.

Earlier this year, Character.AI and Google settled a series of lawsuits regarding teens who died by suicide after using the chatbots.

OpenAI, the biggest name in the industry, has been sued numerous times as ChatGPT allegedly sent users spiraling into "AI psychosis," resulting in several deaths.

As AI chatbot usage becomes more widespread among millions of users around the world, there's nothing to suggest the shocking wrongful death lawsuit allegations will become any less frequent.

Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April 2025 filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.

If you're feeling suicidal or experiencing a mental health crisis, please talk to somebody. You can call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. You can reach the Trans Lifeline by calling 877-565-8860 or the Trevor Project at 866-488-7386. Text "START" to Crisis Text Line at 741-741. Contact the NAMI HelpLine at 1-800-950-NAMI, Monday through Friday from 10:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. ET, or email info@nami.org. If you don't like the phone, consider using the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline Chat. Here is a list of international resources.

TL;DR: You know that small pile of chargers that seems to live permanently on your desk or nightstand? The one with tangled cables and at least one mystery cord? This is the fix.

Opens in a new window Credit: Adam Elements Mag 3 Ultra Qi2 25W 3-in-1 Foldable Charger $86.99
$109 Save $22.01   Get Deal

The Mag 3 Ultra Qi2 25W 3-in-1 Foldable Charger, currently $86.99 (reg. $109) for a limited time, is built to simplify your setup while delivering noticeably faster wireless charging.

Instead of rotating between devices, you can power your iPhone, Apple Watch, and AirPods all at the same time — in one compact stand.

Mashable Deals Be the first to know! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Loading... Sign Me Up By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Thanks for signing up!

The big upgrade here is Qi2 25W technology. It delivers up to 70 percent faster charging compared to the previous generation, reaching 0–50 percent in around 30 minutes on supported devices. That makes quick top-ups before work, travel, or heading out much more practical.

Magnetic alignment keeps your phone securely positioned, while the raised platform prevents camera interference. You can charge in portrait or landscape, which is useful for StandBy mode, watching videos, or jumping on FaceTime while powering up.

It’s also designed with portability in mind. The stand folds flat for easy packing, then unfolds into a clean, modern charging station wherever you set it down — at home, at the office, or in a hotel room.

Built-in safety features like Foreign Object Detection, Over-Current Protection, and Over-Voltage Protection help ensure reliable performance.

If you’re looking to clean up your charging situation and move to faster, next-gen wireless power, this is worth a look. Get the Mag 3 Ultra Qi2 25W 3-in-1 Foldable Charger for just $86.99 (reg. $109).

StackSocial prices subject to change.

Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to yesterday's Connections.

TL;DR: Pay $68.99 once for lifetime access to Sterling Stock Picker — AI-powered stock insights, personalized recommendations, and portfolio-building tools at 86% off.

Opens in a new window Credit: Sterling Stock Picker Sterling Stock Picker: Lifetime Subscription $68.99
$486 Save $417.01   Get Deal

Investing doesn’t have to mean juggling spreadsheets, chasing headlines, or second-guessing every market move. If you’ve ever stared at a stock chart wondering what to actually do with it, Sterling Stock Picker is built for that moment.

For $68.99 (reg. $486), you get lifetime access to this popular platform designed to simplify stock selection and portfolio management.

Mashable Deals Be the first to know! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Loading... Sign Me Up By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Thanks for signing up!

Sterling Stock Picker combines traditional financial analysis with patent-pending North Star technology to give clear signals: buy, sell, hold, or avoid. Instead of manually crunching numbers, the software processes earnings, growth, risk data, and sector performance behind the scenes.

You’ll also get access to Finley, an AI-powered financial coach. Finley can answer questions about your portfolio, assess risk, and offer strategic suggestions based on your investment goals and tolerance level.

The built-in Portfolio Builder helps you construct a diversified portfolio in minutes. For those who prefer a more focused approach, the platform highlights high-growth “Stock Rockets” and sector trends to support concentrated strategies.

It’s designed for both newer investors who want structured guidance and experienced investors who appreciate streamlined analysis tools.

At this price, it’s a practical way to add data-driven clarity to your long-term investing approach.

Get lifetime Sterling Stock Picker access for a one-time payment of just $68.99 (reg. $486).

StackSocial prices subject to change.

"Bad on purpose" is a dangerous tightrope to walk. Usually, the end result is something that feels like it's trying too hard or thinks it's funnier than it actually is. Nintendo's new Virtual Boy accessory for the Switch and Switch 2 manages to pull it off, though.

That's because, rather than setting out to make something that sucks, Nintendo instead took something that sucked in the mid-90s and recreated it faithfully for the sake of artistic preservation. It's retro nerdiness purely for the love of the game.

In 1995, the Virtual Boy was (and remains) Nintendo's biggest hardware embarrassment. It was a way-too-early attempt at VR with stereoscopic 3D features that failed because it was neither a true console nor a true portable machine. Every game was displayed exclusively in red and black, and using it for more than a few minutes at a time will ruin your neck and eyes.

SEE ALSO: Nintendo's Virtual Boy replica for Switch 2 is finally available to buy

For $100 (and the cost of a Nintendo Switch Online subscription so you can actually play the games), you can almost perfectly recreate that retro experience on your Switch or Switch 2. This new accessory isn't a cleaned-up, refined, or redesigned take on the original idea; it just is the original idea, but with the ability to shove a portable Switch display inside of it. It still hurts to look at and play. The games aren't especially good or interesting, outside of Wario Land. You can't even output the games to a TV or any other external display, making it almost totally incompatible with today's "everything should be streamable" attitude in games.

And that's exactly why it rules. I love the Switch Virtual Boy accessory, and I will almost certainly not use it for any longer than it took to write this article and shoot the accompanying video because I value my eyesight. It reproduces the original artistic vision at the expense of user comfort and convenience, and thank God for that.

How to buy the Nintendo Switch Virtual Boy accessory

The new version of the Virtual Boy is an online Nintendo Store Exclusive. To try it yourself, head to the Nintendo store and sign into your account. There is one catch, however — you need a Nintendo Switch Online membership to purchase the device. It's priced at $99.99 and available for sale now.

Opens in a new window Credit: Nintendo Virtual Boy for Nintendo Switch $99.99 at Nintendo
  Shop Now

What Maggie Gyllenhaal has done in her reimaging of The Bride of Frankenstein is utterly deranged. And thank God. 

No shade to brilliant director James Whale, whose 1935 Universal sequel The Bride of Frankenstein is both exhilarating and cheekily queer. But — as Gyllenhaal has repeated frequently on The Bride!'s press tour — his titular monstress never speaks a word in her few short minutes of screen time. Still, as that original Bride, Elsa Lanchester made this she-beast an instantly compelling marvel who has become truly iconic, an intoxicating mix of high femme and the horrific. 

Gyllenhaal smartly pulls these stylistic elements into her Bride!, as her revived Bride coughs up black bile that stains her lips in a perfect Cupid's bow, with a chic and unnerving stain creeping up her high cheekbones. Gyllenhaal also borrows from Whale the inspired choice to have her lead actress play both the Monster's Mate (as Lanchester was originally credited) and the author who birthed her, Mary Shelley. However, far from the prim, giggling lady presented in The Bride of Frankenstein, Gyllenhaal's Shelley (played by Hamnet Academy Award nominee Jessie Buckley) is a yowling spirit from beyond the grave who is thoroughly mad, in both senses of the word. 

Presented in a suffocating black-and-white close-up, a heaving Mary Shelley introduces this story as the one she still wished to tell, even from the grave. Her rage of being silenced echoes across the ages, possessing a gangster's moll in 1930s Chicago. And from there, Gyllenhaal weaves in references to Whale's Frankenstein and Bride of Frankenstein, Shelley's novel Frankenstein, as well as Mel Brooks' parody Young Frankenstein, Arthur Penn's Bonnie and Clyde, and Lizzie Borden's 1983 dystopian classic, Born in Flames. 

It's a chaotic mix that is wild and messy, and utterly exciting. Through sputtering dialogue, propulsive and repulsive visuals, and even spirited dance numbers, The Bride! comes together into a dark, campy, and romantic tapestry. 

The Bride! slams Frankenstein's monster into 1930s Chicago gangland.  Jessie Buckley wields a gun in "The Bride!" Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

This Bride's story begins at a long table in a Chicago nightclub, where a moll called Ida (Buckley) is playing nice to a crude gangster (Our Flag Means Death's Matthew Maher). But something overtakes her, and its name is Mary Shelley. Possessed by the author, Ida drops her placating smiles and spits on this brute. Her American accent is shed for a snarling British voice that howls of the crimes of a local kingpin. Ida can't stop Mary from speaking from her mouth, and soon Ida will pay the price with a fatal fall.

Elsewhere in this bustling city, Frankenstein's monster (Christian Bale), who prefers to go by "Frank," has arrived at the door of Dr. Euphronious (Annette Bening), a mad scientist with an interest in raising the dead. Pointing to her published works, the century-old monster entreats her to take pity on him and build him a bride, meaning a resurrected dead girl who could end his lonely wandering. Reluctantly, Euphronious agrees, and after a bit of grave-robbing, Ida is reinvigorated with no memory of who she was before and an alt-girl glow-up.

Annette Bening as Dr. Euphronious in "The Bride!" Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

This radical experiment jolts Ida's bob all white, eradicating the previously dark roots. The bile she sputters stains not only her face, but leaves lines down her neck to her breasts, down her arm to her fingers. She is stained or tattooed, giving a constant reminder to the darkness within her, even as her burnt-orange silk dress flutters around teal tights. 

Within Ida lies a fire, which fuels her to drag Frank to an underground night spot for dancing and debauchery. But when two strangers reject Ida's refusal of their advances ("I prefer not to!" becomes her mantra), Frank steps in with a deadly chivalry. Now, these monsters must go on the run from the law. Like the legend of Bonnie and Clyde, they chase their bliss, busting heads along the way — while seeming doomed to a very violent end. But until then, female copycats emulate the Bride's look and itchy trigger finger, while she and her monster mate fall in love. 

Maggie Gyllenhaal fuses romance and rage. Penélope Cruz as Myrna Mallow and Peter Sarsgaard as Det. Jake Wiles in "The Bride!" Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

The politics of The Bride! are anything but subtle, as the speech of women is presented as a threat to a sordid status quo. From the start, Shelley reflects on how patriarchal society oppresses women's speech as a matter of course. Ida is a threat to gangsters because of what she could say to the cops. As the Bride, it's a furious speech she gives about "brain attack" that incites imitators who share her feminist fury. After that first attack, which Frank intervenes in, she'll use a gun to defend herself against another attempted sexual assault from a man. She'll sputter the phrase "me too" and speak of the "angry dead," indicating a legion of women who demand to be heard from beyond the grave. 

The genre leanings of The Bride! urge Buckley into a manic performance that is often over the top, but this is wisely constructed as Ida is a woman possessed by the mad dead. One moment, she's a good-time gal, joyous in dancing or watching a movie with Frank's favorite film star, the singing, tap-dancing Ronnie Reed (a slick Jake Gyllenhaal). Next, she's wrathful and ranting. And Frank is never thrown by her moods, instead swooning over her mind, even if he can't understand her tumult. Therein lies the romance; he doesn't love her despite her outrageous behavior, but for all of her.

Christian Bale and Jake Gyllenhaal in "The Bride!" Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

How many of us can feel divided, pressured to be pleasing and happy, but pulled by a fury at injustice that threatens to electrify us like a lightning bolt, ripping our flesh from our very bones? Through her Bride, Buckley embodies the stressful duality of being a woman in a world run by violent men.

In a cheeky B-plot, Gyllenhaal also critiques so-called allies through Detective Jake Wiles, who is played by her real-life husband, Peter Sarsgaard. It's Jake who's tasked with tracking down the monsters on a spree across state lines. But Jake is not much of a detective. He calls himself the "Gal Friday" to his "secretary" Myrna Mallow (a gloriously chic Penélope Cruz), who is the real brains behind his operation. While their relationship is playful and platonic, Jake is a charming fool who gets all the credit, while she does all the actual detective work and gets only condescending sneers from policemen. In this too, Gyllenhaal expresses a wail of frustration. And yet...

The Bride! refuses to take itself or cinema too seriously.  Jessie Buckley is revived in "The Bride!" Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

Some elements of Gyllenhaal's gender politics might feel distractingly sharp amid the genre richness, like a monologue from Sarsgaard about how women are used and overlooked by the men around them. However, The Bride! avoids feeling preachy by embracing the same level of earnestness for Gyllenhaal's stylistic big swings.

Colors switch from a gothic black-and-white to a grave-digging sequence flooded in a dreamy dark blue. A party sequence throbs with bisexual lighting, its dancers swirling in pinks, blues, and purples. Neon lights glitter in grimy cities, while the Bride's costume screams with colors bright yet dingy. Moods swirl with the flush of blues, yellows, reds, and greens. 

Christian Bale and Jessie Buckley play Frankenstein's Monster and his bride in "The Bride!" Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

It's not a bright, bubbly, or even joyous palette. These hues are a reflection of the Bride's need to be heard, to be seen. She will not be demure; she demands to stand out. This exhibitionism is further bolstered by the aforementioned dance numbers. The film is not just Frank and the Bride's story, but also their fantasy. Having long clung to Hollywood cinema for solace in a lonely existence (relatable!), Frank imagines meeting his bride as something out of a movie. He even mimics a Ronnie Reed dance move he saw on the silver screen to woo her. Later, they will envision themselves on the screen — as dancing lovers, as lurking monsters — and they will bring both of these fantasies into their journey, as they decide who they will be to each other. 

In one of the film's most shocking sequences, the pair cut loose at a posh party, upsetting the formal veneer with a furious explosion of movement. Others will be possessed by the Mary Shelley spirit, compelled to join in, creating a feral and fun flashmob. Yes, seeing Frankenstein's monster dancing is reminiscent of Young Frankenstein, but just when you think that might be a nod to the Mel Brooks' classic, Bale bellows out, "Putting on the ritz!" There is no doubt. Gyllenhaal isn't winking at her references; she's smirking at us with a wide-open mouth, ready to yawp. 

Gyllenhaal rejects fluidity or a staunch form that adheres to genre conventions. Instead, she boldly blends elements of horror with humor, romance with repulsion, creating an unapologetically wild and campy adventure. Some might call The Bride! messy or juvenile. I would call it alive and rebellious. 

Gyllenhaal and her cast don't just dust off a classic tale for a safe money grab. (Looking at you, Disney live-action remakes!) They tear various Frankenstein iterations to bits, then create an exquisite corpse of the pieces, festooning it with elements from other films about violence, revolt, and violation. The result is a film that is utterly electrifying, sure to spark something in hearts young and old. 

While I relished this movie's wild journey, I also grinned to imagine the girls who will watch this like I once did The Craft, appreciating its genre thrills and, beyond that, seeing myself in the furious and feminine at its core. 

The Bride! opens in theaters and IMAX on March 6. 

In today’s episode of f*ck the patriarchy, there’s a new website called “Check Her Body Count” that claims to use AI to calculate a woman’s “body count” using her Instagram profile. But it's both terribly inaccurate and misogynistic in nature — even if comparisons are being made to the whisper network site, Tea.

The website went viral on Feb. 26, after X user @weretuna shared an ad for Check Her Body Count on their feed. The post reads: “Suspicious that your girl has 10+ body count? Now you don’t have to guess. You paste her ig [sic] URL, and the app brutally estimates her body count by checking her followers, posts, and stories."

SEE ALSO: How AdultFriendFinder subscriptions appear on your bank statement

The post has amassed 6.1 million views as of this publication.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Before I go on an absolute rant, let’s just explain what “body count” is for the people who may not know: the number of sexual partners a person has had in their lifetime. Also, Mashable attempted to reach out to the Check Her Body Count contact email, but it bounced back.

OK, so here’s what I have to say about this.

1.) Obviously, this isn’t the most important point, but I just want everyone to understand that this site is completely inaccurate. There’s a little disclaimer at the bottom of the site that admits: "This tool does not access, connect to, or retrieve data from any third-party platform. All outputs are randomly generated for entertainment only and do not reflect real individuals."

Not only that, but a developer named Cappy (@CappyIshihara) reposted the viral post with his two cents, confirming that the site doesn't even access Instagram. It just validates the URL in your browser, spits out a random number, and caches it locally. In his words: “this sh*t is completely clientside, zero net, cache in localstorage."

My editor tried the site for herself, and it stated she had more "male followers" than actual total followers she has on Instagram.

2.) The idea of this is gross AF, and the fact that some commenters are saying that this site is no worse than the Tea App is exactly how and why tech is so dangerous today. The Tea App, which relaunched as a website after Apple's App Store booted it last year, is a safe space for women to discuss "red flags" and find info on potential suitors — it’s very “Are We Dating the Same Guy” — so that they can decide whether they're entering potentially dangerous situations.

Yet, here are just a few examples of what some men are saying about Check Her Body Count:

• "Nah, this stays up until [the] Tea App gets dumped."

• "Someone doesn't like the consequences of their actions?"

• "So women are upset at this, but find the Tea App, which berates men and tells other women how supposedly bad a guy is and ruins his dating reputation, okay? Yea, no. I fully support this website."

Comparing a whisper network meant to keep women physically safe to a tool designed to arbitrarily shame and surveil women for having sex is peak misogyny.

“Body count is a gross, inaccurate metric rooted in misogyny — period,” Angie Rowntree, founder and director of the porn site Sssh.com, tells Mashable. “It dehumanizes women and normalizes the surveillance and violation of women.”

And let’s just pause and talk about the exhausting double standard fueling all of this. If a guy has a lot of sex, he’s celebrated as "the man." But if a woman has the exact same amount of sex, she’s branded a "whore." And god forbid she chooses not to have sex, because then she’s instantly labeled "prudish" or a tease. It's a completely rigged game designed to make us apologize for our own bodies, no matter what we do.

As Rowntree notes, obsessing over this number "completely ignores context like consent and pleasure, and pretends that having sexual experience somehow diminishes a person's worth." In reality, having multiple partners may translate to greater confidence, better boundaries, and more fulfilling sex lives.

3.) We are seeing a terrifying trend where AI and tech are being weaponized by male-dominated online subcultures to enforce patriarchal control. If that sounds dramatic, let's look at the receipts. Deepfake technology gained notoriety through the creation of non-consensual sexual images of women. A recent investigation by the Tech Transparency Project found 102 "nudify" AI apps (which render people, often women, naked) hosted across Google Play and the Apple App Store. Those apps were downloaded more than 705 million times and generated $117 million in revenue. As the Tech Transparency Project wrote, "Because Google and Apple take a cut of that revenue, they are directly profiting from the activity of these apps" — meaning they are making money off the digital abuse and sexualization of women.

And have we forgotten about Grok? During an 11-day period between December 2025 and January 2026 alone, Elon Musk's chatbot produced an estimated three million sexualized images, including deepfakes of real, well-known women.

“The Grok scandal shows how fast 'fun' AI features can quickly turn toxic when they ignore users' rights (in this case, women's rights) to control their own public images and narratives," says Rowntree.

This is about so much more than a fake Instagram scraper — it's about an online ecosystem (often tied to anti-feminist "red-pilled" and incel communities) that actively pits men against women and uses tech as a tool for harassment. Dr. Mathilde Pavis, a leading adviser on AI regulation, told Newsweek that the concept behind Check Her Body Count reflects a deeper, dangerous cultural logic: "that women's bodies and private lives are subject to algorithmic judgment, sexual scoring and public evaluation."

"The body count website did not happen in a vacuum," says Rowntree. "There are men (and entire cultures) in 2026 who still think a hymen is a 'freshness seal' and virginity is the sum total of a woman's worth." Whether it's deepfaking women's bodies or creating fake algorithms to publicly score their sexual history, the goal is the exact same: policing women.

“Women are not property; we are human beings,” Rowntree adds. “As such, our bodies are also not public property to be exploited without consent, including for algorithmic judgment or AI manipulation."

Apple has had an unusually busy week — no keynote required.

In a flurry of press releases, the Cupertino company unveiled a new iPhone, a refreshed MacBook Air, a new MacBook Pro, a pair of new desktop displays, and the chips that power it all.

If you're just getting up to speed, here's every major product Apple announced — and more importantly, what you need to know about each one.

iPhone 17e Credit: Mashable/Apple

The iPhone 17e, announced March 2, is built around Apple's latest-generation A19 chip — the same processor powering the flagship iPhone 17 lineup. It also adds C1X, a next-generation cellular modem the company says is roughly twice as fast as the modem in the iPhone 16e.

The 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR display on the 17e now features Ceramic Shield 2, which Apple says offers three times the scratch resistance of the previous generation.

SEE ALSO: Comparing iPhone 17e vs. iPhone 17: Is the new $599 phone good enough?

The 17e's camera system has been overhauled with a 48MP Fusion lens that Apple says can function like two cameras in one — offering an optical-quality 2x telephoto crop in addition to the standard wide angle. Portrait mode has been improved with a smarter image pipeline that can automatically detect people, dogs, and cats and save depth data in the background, so you can apply bokeh after the fact.

The most consumer-friendly change: iPhone 17e now ships with MagSafe, Apple's magnetic wireless charging ecosystem, supporting up to 15W. The iPhone 16e topped out at 7.5W over standard Qi. Baseline storage has also doubled, to 256GB, at the same $599 starting price.

iPhone 17e comes in black, white, and a new soft pink color. Pre-orders open March 4; the phone is officially available on March 11.

MacBook Air with M5

Apple refreshed the MacBook Air laptop with its M5 chip. The result is up to four times faster for AI tasks than the MacBook Air with M4, the company says, and up to 9.5 times faster than the M1 model. The new chip features a 10-core CPU and a 10-core GPU, with a Neural Accelerator built into each core.

Storage gets a meaningful upgrade too. The new MacBook Air now starts at 512GB — double the previous standard — and can be configured up to 4TB for the first time. Apple claims the new SSD also delivers read/write speeds that are twice as fast as those in the M4 MacBook Air.

The new Apple N1 wireless chip brings Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6 to the Air, delivering improved performance and reliability. Battery life is unchanged, promising up to 18 hours on a charge. The design — a fanless aluminum chassis in 13- and 15-inch options — is unchanged too. Colors include sky blue, midnight, starlight, and silver.

The 13-inch MacBook Air with M5 starts at $1,099 (or $999 for education). The 15-inch starts at $1,299 ($1,199 for education). Pre-orders open March 4, and the laptop ships March 11.

Macbook Neo

Apple also unveiled the MacBook Neo, a brand-new entry-level laptop starting at $599 — or $499 for students and educators — marking the company's most affordable Mac ever.

The 13-inch machine runs on Apple's A18 Pro chip, the same processor found in the iPhone 16 Pro lineup, paired with 8GB of unified memory that cannot be upgraded. It features a Liquid Retina display, up to 16 hours of battery life, and comes in four colors: blush, indigo, silver, and citrus.

But as Mashable's Stan Schroeder noted in an early spec breakdown, the low price comes with tradeoffs — Touch ID costs an extra $100, the battery is considerably smaller than the one in the MacBook Air, and prospective buyers who need more than 8GB of RAM are simply out of luck. MacBook Neo is available for pre-order now, and ships on March 11.

MacBook Pro with M5 Pro and M5 Max

The new 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pro models are powered by M5 Pro and M5 Max, which Apple says deliver up to four times the AI performance of the M4 Pro and M4 Max, and up to eight times the AI performance of M1-era models. Both chips are built on a new "Fusion Architecture" that combines two dies into a single system-on-a-chip, enabling performance gains that Apple says wouldn't be possible with a traditional single-die design.

SEE ALSO: How to preorder the new Apple MacBook Pros with the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips — preorders now live

MacBook Pro with M5 Pro is aimed at data modelers, sound designers, and complex coders. It pairs an up to 18-core CPU with an up to 20-core GPU and supports up to 64GB of unified memory. The M5 Max doubles down with an up-to 40-core GPU and up to 128GB of unified memory — a figure Apple says meaningfully improves token-generation speeds for Large Language Models (LLMs) running locally.

Storage starts at 1TB for the M5 Pro models, and 2TB for the M5 Max. Apple says SSD speeds have roughly doubled over the previous generation, reaching up to 14.5GB/s read/write. The MacBook Pro also adds the N1 chip for Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6, and ships with three Thunderbolt 5 ports. Battery life is rated at up to 24 hours.

The 14-inch MacBook Pro with M5 Pro starts at $2,199; the 16-inch version starts at $2,699. M5 Max configurations start at $3,599 for the 14-inch model and $3,899 for the 16-inch model.

All models come in space black and silver. Pre-orders open March 4; availability March 11.

iPad Air M4

Apple also refreshed the iPad Air lineup, bumping it to the M4 chip with 12GB of unified memory — a 50 percent increase over the previous generation. The tablet is available in 11- and 13-inch sizes and, according to Apple, delivers performance up to 30 percent faster than the M3 model and more than twice as fast as the M1 version.

SEE ALSO: The new Apple iPad Air is live on Walmart: Pre-order now to save up to $60

Both the N1 wireless chip for Wi-Fi 7 and the C1X cellular modem make their iPad debut here, with Apple claiming the latter cuts modem power consumption by roughly 30 percent compared to the M3 model.

Pricing holds steady at $599 for the 11-inch Wi-Fi model and $799 for the 13-inch. Pre-orders open March 4; availability starts March 11.

Studio Display and Studio Display XDR

Apple announced a refresh of its external display lineup, introducing both a new Studio Display and an entirely new Studio Display XDR. The Studio Display gets a notable upgrade in the form of Thunderbolt 5 connectivity — two ports that support daisy-chaining up to four displays — and a new 12MP Center Stage camera that now includes support for Desk View, which simultaneously shows the caller and a top-down view of their workspace.

The core display panel remains a 27-inch 5K Retina panel at 600 nits, with P3 wide color.

The Studio Display XDR is a bigger story. Apple is positioning it as a replacement for the Pro Display XDR at a significantly lower price. It features the same 27-inch 5K Retina canvas, but with a mini-LED backlight system using over 2,000 local dimming zones, up to 2,000 nits of peak HDR brightness, a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio, and a 120Hz refresh rate with Adaptive Sync.

The XDR display adds support for the Adobe RGB color gamut alongside P3 and introduces new DICOM medical imaging presets — pending FDA clearance — that's aimed at radiologists who want to use the display for diagnostic work.

The new Studio Display with a tilt-adjustable stand starts at $1,599. Studio Display XDR with a tilt- and height-adjustable stand starts at $3,299 — that's $2,700 less than the original Pro Display XDR at launch.

As with everything else on Apple's list, pre-orders for the displays open March 4, with availability on March 11.

Before the dust had settled on the ruins of the Shajareh Tayyebeh school — a casualty of the recent U.S.-Israel military strikes against Iran, and one which resulted in the deaths of up to 168 adults and children — people were already engagement-farming online. Clips of digital flight simulators were passed off as real-time ops footage, while out-of-context images of battleships and old videos of aerial missile attacks were repurposed to sell users a tale of Iranian dominance. AI-edited content proliferated.

According to experts, the posts had accumulated hundreds of millions of views in just a handful of days.

SEE ALSO: AI has made us all surveillance targets. This tool helps you fight back.

The growing number of viral posts — and the potential for even more to pop up as users earned cash for the viral falsehoods — was alarming enough to prompt X to edit its policies on misinformation. As of yesterday, X says it will suspend users from its Creator Revenue Sharing program if they post AI-generated content depicting armed conflict without labeling it as such.  

And not even Google searches are safe from misinformation these days. 

The proliferation of digital misinformation is the product of a web of bots and engagement farming accounts, all with the shared goal of being the loudest, most clicked-on account in the room. 

Some hope to win political and social influence, others just want the money. Meanwhile, users, prone to confirmation bias and a reliance on digital news sources, repeatedly fall victim to their racket. Engagement farming, no longer just exchanging the currency of memes and clickbait, has become a dangerous, politically fraught game.

What users are seeing as the U.S.-Iran conflict rages

Recent posts engaging in active disinformation about the conflict in Iran primarily involve exaggerating the scale and success of Iranian counterattacks, experts explain. 

A recent investigation by Wired documented hundreds of posts across Elon Musk's X that included misleading footage and photos — including AI-manipulated content — or promoted false claims about the scale of the attacks, many of which were posted in the immediate aftermath of missile strikes. A post with more than 4 million views claimed to show ballistic missiles sailing over Dubai, but actually depicted an Iranian attack on Tel Aviv in Oct. 2024. Another with more than 375,000 impressions shows a fictitious before-and-after image of the shelled compound of assassinated Iranian leader Ali Hosseini Khamenei. 

According to Wired, nearly all of the posts were shared by premium subscriber accounts with blue checkmarks, including state-funded media outlets in Iran. 

As in previous military conflicts, accounts have also attempted to pass off video game footage as verified news clips, including AI-manipulated images of downed F-35 fighter jets ripped from flight simulator games. The images have been shared across TikTok, some with links to Russian influence operations, the BBC reported. 

In addition to out-of-context footage and misleading content, the BBC also documented a handful of completely AI-generated videos that had amassed nearly 100 million total views, shared by what the outlet calls notorious "super-spreaders" of disinformation. 

Visuals are a good way for us to process what is going on in war when we can't comprehend the scale of these conflicts. - Sofia Rubinson, NewsGuard

A report from misinformation watchdog NewsGuard also chronicled a cadre of users sharing viral posts circulating false claims of targeted military strikes against U.S. and Israeli strongholds, predominately using repurposed video footage and out of context or completely recontextualized images of destruction. 

"[These videos] are posted by anonymous accounts that tend to report on geopolitical conflicts. These are accounts that are known to NewsGuard for spreading exaggerated claims, usually from a pro-Iran perspective," said Sofia Rubinson, senior editor of NewsGuard's Reality Check newsletter and co-author of the report. From there, Rubinson explains, other accounts with larger followings pick up and spread the false claims. 

For example, hours after initial reports of the U.S.'s military strikes in Iran, users on X began reposting an image of a sinking naval aircraft carrier. Users claimed that it showed a recent attack on the battleship USS Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea. The U.S. military's Central Command issued a statement refuting the claim that same day. NewsGuard confirmed the image actually showed the intentional sinking of the USS Oriskany that took place nearly 20 years ago. The claim was shared by unverified "news" accounts and even Kenyan parliamentary member Peter Salasya. Salasya's post has been viewed more than 6 million times. 

Multiple accounts, including Salasya's, shared another video allegedly showing Israel's Dimona nuclear power plant under siege by air. The video racked up hundreds of thousands of impressions across anti-Israel and pro-Iran pages — an X Community Note now appears below the video on Salasya's page, clarifying the images are of a March 2017 attack in Balaklia, Ukraine.

NewsGuard found that such posts have already garnered at least 21.9 million views across X. 

Posts inducing fear of domestic retaliatory attacks have also circulated online, including an unverified list of U.S. cities alleged to be top targets for Iranian sleeper cells — the list appears to have been written in Apple's Notes app.

Disinformation is only going to get worse

The acceleration of advanced generative AI and relaxed moderation policies across social media platforms has exacerbated an online misinformation crisis, experts have warned. 

Particularly over recent months, including during the U.S.-led capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, NewsGuard researchers have noticed a pattern in online disinformation emerging over periods of breaking news.

"People now have a shorter window for the lapse between an event occurring and authentic visuals coming out of the media," explained Rubinson. To put it more bluntly: Users are losing their patience, used to an online environment where information is usually right at your fingertips. 

These brief periods, or voids, between breaking news reports and confirmed video or photos become fertile ground for disinformation bots and engagement farmers, Rubinson says. They also threaten to reinforce conspiratorial thinking — that mainstream news outlets are keeping information from the public, for example — and lend themselves to a user's own confirmation bias.

Political conflict is particularly rife for the spreading of such misinformation, which is in turn strengthened by active disinformation campaigns from both sides of armed conflict. Researchers have found that a lack of proximity to events makes it easier to believe out of context or exaggerated information. 

"It's an attempt to fill this fog of war," said Rubsinson. "It can be very overwhelming for people. They want to make sense of it, and visuals are a good way for us to process what is going on in war when we can't comprehend the scale of these conflicts." 

This becomes a greater problem as individuals increasingly use social media platforms as sole sources for news and as previously reliable fact-checking tools, including straightforward Google searches, become more unreliable.

SEE ALSO: U.S. government creates website to get around European content bans AI is harming more than helping 

AI chatbots and search have become embedded into the very fiber of real world crisis events, as users turn to them real time fact checkers. Rubinson said that nearly every X post NewsGuard analyzed included the same reply: "@Grok is this true?"

But AI assistants and platform chatbots, including X's Grok, are notoriously unreliable at disseminating and verifying breaking news. They are also inconsistent at applying their own platforms' moderation policies. The BBC found that Grok erroneously verified recent AI-generated images depicting Iranian military movements, for example. 

According to a second report by NewsGuard published March 3, Google AI-powered Search Summaries have repeated misleading claims about the U.S.-Iran conflict when prompted with reverse image searches. For example, NewsGuard researchers uploaded a frame from a video shared online claiming to show the destruction of a CIA outpost in Dubai. Google's AI summary verified the story, writing: "The image shows a fire at a high-rise residential building in Dubai, UAE, reportedly occurring on March 1, 2026, following regional tensions. … Conflicting reports emerged regarding the cause, with some sources mentioning a drone strike and others referring to the building as a specific intelligence facility." 

The video actually depicts a 2015 residential fire in the city of Sharjah.     

Security experts have sounded alarm bells over such "AI information threats," including AI tools used to generate and amplify misleading content. A report by the UK Centre for Emerging Technology and Security suggests the worsening information environment may pose existential threats to public safety, national security, and democracy without direct intervention. 

Meanwhile, civilians and journalists on the ground in Iran are fighting back against a near total internet blackout, following a massive push by the Trump administration and its ally Elon Musk to get Starlink internet connections to those on the ground. Bad actors, on the other hand, are still finding their way through the block and back onto sites like X.

SAVE $400.01: As of March 4, get the Mova Z60 Ultra Roller Complete Robot Vacuum and Mop for $1,098.99 at Amazon, down from its usual price of $1,499. That's a discount of 27%.

Opens in a new window Credit: Amazon Mova Z60 Ultra Roller Complete Robot Vacuum and Mop $1,098.99 at Amazn
$1,499 Save $400.01   Get Deal

Tired of spending all your extra time vacuuming and mopping your home? It's 2026, and you've got better things to do. You can offload those tasks to a robot vacuum and recoup that lost time doing things you actually like. And we've found a great model that can both save you time and money, so you can get back to living your life instead of doing menial tasks.

As of March 4, get the Mova Z60 Ultra Roller Complete Robot Vacuum and Mop for $1,098.99 at Amazon, down from its usual price of $1,499. That's a discount of 27%.

SEE ALSO: The Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 robot vacuum is down to a record-low $299.99 at Amazon

This powerful robot vacuum and mop combo can handle all the dirty work you don't want to do. It has 28,000Pa of suction combined with a tangle-free brush, so it can not only cut through dirt and debris while capturing up to 99% of large dirt particles, but it can pick up human and pet hair without tangling. Its TurboForce 8 high-speed motor ensures it does all this without any hiccups.

After you've had the robovac go over your home with a fine-toothed comb to pick up the dirt, you can return with the mop, which uses real-time clean water spray to rinse the mop as it cleans to avoid cross-contamination. It also uses smart fluffing to better help maintain the mop, so it doesn't get dingy and old as time wears on to ruin its performance.

If you're ready to turn your cleaning routine over to the robots, this is an excellent option to rely on that can pretty much handle itself. And with $400 off, now's the perfect time to buy it, too.

The things you record with your AI-powered Meta Ray-Ban glasses — yes, even those intimate moments where you think you're alone — are probably being seen by strangers.

An investigation by Swedish outlets Svenska Dagbladet and Göteborgs-Posten found that offshore Meta workers in Kenya were asked to analyze intimate and even "disturbing" videos taken by glasses wearers, including videos taken in bathrooms, footage featuring nudity and sexual content, and images showing personal information like bank accounts. It's part of a process known as data labeling, used to train AI models with footage first reviewed and annotated by humans so that the AI can understand what it's "looking" at.

SEE ALSO: TikTok won't encrypt your DMs

Workers told the publication that many of the videos appear to be moments captured when users weren't aware they were being recorded. The group works under Sama, the same Meta contractor facing a class action lawsuit on behalf of content moderators who allege they have been exploited and forced to review traumatic content without proper working conditions.

"You understand that it is someone’s private life you are looking at, but at the same time you are just expected to carry out the work. You are not supposed to question it. If you start asking questions, you are gone," one employee told the publications.

Meta's Terms of Service reserves the right to send users' interactions with its AI services, including its always-on live AI features, to human moderators — the company referred to this policy when asked for comment by the news outlets.

The Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses collaboration initially launched in 2023 to mixed reviews about its photo and video capabilities and AI features. Meta released the upgraded AI-powered Meta Ray-Ban Display model in September, complete with a new Neural Band interface and promises of AI assistant integrations that would turn them into glasses of the future.

Sales of the glasses tripled in 2025, CNBC reported, with more than 7 million units sold.

But in the months since, Meta's wearable eye camera device has received widespread blowback, following a rise in influencer content depicting Meta glasses wearers secretly recording and even harassing unsuspecting strangers. Wearers have deduced ways to obscure the glasses' always-on recording light, intended to alert the public when a user is taking video, and instead turned the smart device into a tool for viral pickup artists and pranksters.

In addition to concerns about personal consent, the device has prompted worries about a fast-growing web of surveillance and facial recognition tech, which Meta has previously come under fire for. The company later said it was moving ahead with live AI features, including potential facial recognition, in 2025 — with the upgrade, a device "always keep its cameras and sensors turned on and use AI to remember what its wearer encountered throughout a day." Privacy advocates also warn the technology could one day be harnessed by third parties, including the federal government's own militarized police forces.

SAVE $50 + GET A FREE $15 AMAZON CREDIT: The Ninja Slushi is on sale at Amazon for $299.99, down from the normal price of $349.99. That's a 14% discount and it comes with a free $15 Amazon credit.

Opens in a new window Credit: Ninja Ninja Slushi $299.99 at Amazon
$349.99 Save $50 get a free $15 Amazon credit Get Deal

We move the clocks forward by one hour this weekend. Yes, that means we all lose an hour of sleep. But it also means that long summer nights are coming. Soon we'll all be outside in the backyard until sunset at 8 p.m. If you're planning epic parties for the summer, check out this deal at Amazon.

As of March 4, the Ninja Slushi is on sale at Amazon for $299.99, down from the normal price of $349.99. That's a 14% discount, and it comes with a free $15 Amazon credit.

With an 88-ounce capacity, the Ninja Slushi is ready to party. It has five pre-set programs that include slush, spiked slush, frappe, milkshake, and frozen juice. That means the Ninja Slushi can get invited to every party from the kids' end-of-school celebration to the 4th of July barbecue.

Depending on your ingredients, you can whip up frozen drinks in as little as 15 minutes with the Ninja Slushi. Others will take up to one hour, but that's still acceptable for party prep. Plus, the Slushi can keep drinks properly chilled and slush-ified to the perfect texture for up to 12 hours.

SEE ALSO: The Dreame L10s Ultra robot vacuum is under $300 at Amazon — save over $40

When it comes time to clean up, the Slushi has a rinse cycle that'll get it prepped and many of the parts are safe to clean in the dishwasher. On Mashable's list of the best Ninja appliances, the Slushi earns the top spot as the best for making frozen drinks.

Mashable Senior Shopping Reporter Leah Stoddart tested out the Ninja Slushi and wrote, "The refreshing spin on mundane bevs is a serotonin booster worth trying." She also mentioned it's quiet while operating and she enjoyed slushing everything from frosé to Pepsi and even a pre-workout electrolyte drink.

While the Ninja Slushi is on sale for under $300 at Amazon, make the upgrade to a more hydrated summer. Amazon is also tossing in a free $15 credit so you can grab some fancy glasses for your frozen bevvies.