- Help
- Google+
UPDATE: Jan. 16, 2025, 11:25 a.m. EST This article was originally published in March 2023. It has been updated in January 2025 in light of Trump's second presidential term and the recent Supreme Court hearing, and includes original interviews from 2023 as well as updated law information.
Free speech online has been attacked in recent years, from the proposed TikTok ban to the death of net neutrality. Given President-elect Donald Trump's second term on the horizon and the proposals of Project 2025 (a conservative wishlist for said term) a real possibility, U.S. lawmakers will likely continue to target access to the free and open internet. One such example is the growing trend of age-verification bills, which mandate individuals to provide proof of age in order to access adult content, or in some cases, even to browse social media platforms. Experts warn that these bills pose serious threats to digital privacy and free speech.
What are age-verification bills?In 2022, Louisiana passed Act 440, which requires visitors to sites with over 33.33 percent of adult content to use a commercial age-verification system (AVS) to prove they're over 18, such as with a government-issued ID. The law went into effect on Jan. 1, 2023.
Following this, a wave of similar bills emerged across the country. As of publication in early 2025, age-verification laws have been enacted in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Virginia. (Tennessee's law is blocked as of this publication.) Georgia's version, SB 351, will take effect July 1, 2025. The Free Speech Coalition, a porn industry lobby group, has been tracking these bills through a comprehensive database.
On Jan. 15, the Supreme Court heard Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, a case about Texas's age-verification law. The decision, which will likely come this summer, will set the precedent for these laws moving forward.
In the UK, similar legislation that called for age verification on porn sites, known as the "porn block," failed in 2019. In January, UK communications watchdog Ofcom called for age verification for explicit content, such as with facial scans or photo ID.
Project 2025 and age-verification billsProject 2025 calls for an outright porn ban and for porn creators to be imprisoned. One of the authors of Project 2025, Russell Vought (who Trump asked to return as the head of the Office of Management and Budget), was caught on a secret recording stating that age-verification bills are a "back door" way to do just that.
"We came up with an idea on pornography to make it so that the porn companies bear the liability for the underage use," Vought told two men undercover as potential donors for his conservative think-tank Center for Renewing America, as reported by The Intercept, "as opposed to the person who visits the website getting to just certify" their age.
"We've got a number of states that are passing this," Vought also said, "and you know what happens is the porn company then says, 'We’re not going to do business in your state.' Which of course is entirely what we were after, right?"
What Vought is referring to is companies like Pornhub blocking states with age-verification laws. As of this publication, Pornhub is blocked in 17 U.S. states.
The downsides to "porn passport" lawsWhile these bills may initially seem sound — no one wants children to access adult content — they are steeped in political implications, as stated above. Even beyond that, the experts say that they won't work for their (so-called) intended purpose and will cause a host of problems.
In terms of the former, these statutes are difficult to enforce and easy to get around. For one, there are going to be websites based in other countries that won't comply with these regulations, said Mike Stabile, director of public affairs at the Free Speech Coalition. "My greatest fear when I looked at [these bills] was that this is…going to push kids to more and more dangerous sites," he said.
For another, software like VPNs (virtual privacy networks) are built to make it seem like the user is somewhere they're not. Days after the Louisiana law went into effect, a Redditor asked if they can use a VPN to get around it. "Yep," the top comment read. "So easy a five year old can do it."
Beyond enforceability, experts say they cause a tremendous privacy risk.
"The immediate concerns are that there is no foolproof age-verification system that is not intrusive, comprehensive, effective, and can be introduced quickly," said Jason Kelley, associate director of digital strategy at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit focused on defending digital rights. Since there aren't systems in place to implement these regulations, tech companies will scramble to respond to these laws. They may do the right thing or the wrong thing unintentionally, like setting up an AVS that's insecure because they don't know how AVS works, or they may do the wrong thing intentionally to gather people's data.
"You create this whole ecosystem, where people's individual behaviors — the websites that they visit — can be tracked and connected to their identity," Kelley continued. "We're essentially creating this immediate requirement for people to share their private information alongside their pornography preference with companies that don't necessarily have a system in place to protect that data."
SEE ALSO: Stripperweb empowered strippers. Where will they go now?A longer-term concern is that there will be a domino effect, which is already happening with the copycat bills. If they were all to pass, Kelley said we'd have an extremely complicated system where different states accept different forms of verification. This could lead to these websites requiring verification from everyone regardless of state to ensure they comply.
"The end result is that we won't have access that's anonymous to much of the web," Kelley said of these flurry of age-verification bills, "which is important for free speech" and other things, like privacy protection. If all these bills went into effect, many people wouldn't be able to access the internet at all without an ID. As it is, there's a "digital divide" where millions of Americans don't have an adequate internet connection at home; verification would only exacerbate this issue of access. While those who do have IDs could get through these barriers, they would need to give up anonymity to do so.
If all these bills went into effect, many people wouldn't be able to access the internet at all without an ID, and those who could access would need to provide documentation.That's not the only potential issue. As former senior security analyst Max Eddy at PCMag (which is owned by Ziff Davis, Mashable's parent company) warned, identity theft could increase in the wake of these laws. It's already happening: "We've already heard reports of phishing going on in Louisiana, where people are impersonating adult sites, and getting people to upload their ID and then selling those IDs…for Bitcoin," Stabile said. "We expect that…identity theft is going to skyrocket."
Users aren't the only people impacted by these laws; adult creators are, too.
Online sex workers are already pushed offline due to bills FOSTA-SESTA, an amendment to Section 230 meant to stop sex trafficking, but has resulted in the removal (or shadowbanning) of sex workers and remotely sexy content from major social platforms like Facebook and Instagram. (Only a single trafficker has been prosecuted under FOSTA-SESTA in its first five years.) Should age-verification bills progress, the problem will inevitably worsen.
"It's just going to censor us," said adult performer and advocate Alana Evans. "How is it going to affect a platform like Twitter?" Currently, Twitter does allow adult content, and Evans sees it as the only platform that has a safe space for performers — but that status hangs in the balance. "If Twitter decides that we can't advertise my cam links anymore" or similar links, she said, "it would kill my business. It would kill my income."
How to protect children from adult content"I worked my butt off to keep my kids away from that material," said Evans, who's a parent. "The most important thing is actually being aware of what your kids are doing in the first place." This includes checking their devices and having open conversations about sex and porn. She's had talks with her son, who's now an adult, where she explained that porn isn't real but rather a "theatrical version" of sex.
"I don't think parents should be afraid of having that conversation," Evans said. One reason teens look at porn is simply because they're curious. "If you're having a conversation with them," she continued, "the curiosity is taken away."
Like Evans, Stabile also calls on parents to be involved with their kids' internet browsing and to have those conversations. There's lots of content beyond porn that's not appropriate for kids — portrayals of violence, for example — and it may be impossible to protect kids from seeing any of it, but you can talk to them about it.
Beyond conversations, Stabile recommends device-level filters that block all websites that are registered RTA, or "Restricted to Adults." "It signals to filters, whether it's your Apple filter or Net Nanny or something like that, that this site should be blocked," he explained. It doesn't matter if a child tries a VPN or some other workaround — the site will be blocked on that device.
The idea behind these bills "is not wrong," said Evans — no one, especially those in the adult industry, wants children watching their content. These bills, however, create risks and can cascade into an online privacy and censorship nightmare that hurts sex workers and other internet users.
"If even a few of them [age-verification bills] pass in different contexts, it will be dangerous for everyone in the United States who goes online," Kelley warned, "because we will not be able to access things privately."
On Jan. 15, 2025, the Supreme Court heard a case about age-verification laws, Free Speech v. Paxton. Its decision will significantly impact online free speech.
Age-verification laws vary by state but typically require users to submit identification in order to visit sites the states deem to have over one-third of explicit content hosted. ID can include submitting one's driver's license, a digital ID, or a facial scan. Since 2022, 19 states have passed age-verification laws, and all but one is currently in effect. The other, Georgia's, goes into effect July 1, 2025. Pornhub currently blocks 17 states from viewing content due to these laws.
SEE ALSO: 6 platforms gaining popularity as TikTok ban deadline nears Free Speech v. Paxton explainedThe Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton case initially began as a challenge to Texas's age-verification law by the adult industry trade organization, the Free Speech Coalition or FSC.
The perceived purpose of these laws is to stop children from looking at porn. But FSC argues that age-verification laws don't stop children from accessing porn sites (due to technology like VPNs), and instead have a chilling effect — stopping adults from accessing content they have the right to access, out of fear of privacy breach, data collection, or documentation of what explicit material they look at.
A Texas judge initially blocked the state's age-verification law due to FSC's challenge, but the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld it. That appeals court, however, struck down a part of the Texas law that would require adult sites to post health warnings about porn.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case last July but said the law could remain in effect before the hearing (which will likely continue during litigation, according to NBC News).
Ahead of the hearing, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton argued that the Supreme Court should reject the appeal for the law, asserting that material on such sites is obscene (and the First Amendment does not protect obscenity), and pointed to the 1968 Supreme Court case Ginsberg v. New York, which concluded that material that isn't obscene may still be "harmful to minors."
During Wednesday's hearing, multiple Supreme Court Justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas, argued that the internet is different than the media argued about in Ginsberg ("girlie" magazines). That signaled that the Ginsberg precedent over these issues might not suffice — but there have been multiple Supreme Court cases about porn since 1968, including 2004's Ashcroft v. ACLU, when the court ruled that a requirement for online publishers to prevent minors from seeing "harmful content" was unconstitutional.
"We thought the law was very clear 20 years ago when the federal government tried to do this and the Ashcroft decision was handed down, and Reno," legal counsel for sexual freedom nonprofit Woodhull Freedom Foundation, Lawrence G. Walters, told Mashable. The latter case he referred to is Reno v. ACLU, a 1997 decision that determined prohibiting "indecent" online speech violated the First Amendment.
How can these laws pass despite the Supreme Court's precedent? The argument, Walters said, is that access to porn is different now, driven by technological advances and the pervasiveness of smartphones. "But really, not much has fundamentally changed," Walters explained. "Hardcore porn was available on the internet when Ashcroft was decided."
The Free Speech Coalition maintained its argument about the chilling effect of age verification. FSC's lawyer instead spoke in favor of device-level filters to prevent children from accessing explicit content, which the conservative justices Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, and Brett Kavanaugh were skeptical about.
Ultimately, the justices must decide which standard to use to review Texas's age-verification law: strict scrutiny (a rigorous review, as in Ashcroft) or rational basis review (which is less strict, as in Ginsberg). FSC is arguing for the former. Justice Elena Kagan said that relaxing strict scrutiny could have "spillover dangers" to other free speech cases.
Arguments for and against age-verification lawsA repeated argument during the hearing was whether online age verification is the same as flashing one's ID at a liquor store. The problem with this comparison, as Woodhull Freedom Foundation asserts, is that flashing one's ID isn't storing one's data (such as one's license information or biometric data like facial scans); there's no third-party access to information; it's not vulnerable to hackers; and it's not complicated as an online age-verification system may be.
"Texas completely failed to appreciate the substantial privacy and security risks at issue and continued to incorrectly suggest that online age verification — which requires millions of internet users to upload and submit identifying information — is no different than quick, one-on-one, in-person ID checks," said Electronic Frontier Foundation staff attorney Lisa Femia in a statement.
"The Texas law robs adult internet users of anonymity, exposes them to serious privacy and security risks, and blocks some adults entirely from accessing sexual content that’s protected under the First Amendment," Femia said.
Another argument, both at the hearing and at a rally outside the Supreme Court by the conservative political advocacy group, American Principles Project, is that one needs to provide an ID to do other activities online. Hence, age verification is "common sense."
"You have to verify your age to buy alcohol online, you verify your age to buy nicotine, even nicotine patches, and you need to verify your age to gamble online," said American Principles Project president Terry Schilling. "You need to verify your age in order to access hardcore and violent pornography."
But this isn't an apples-to-apples comparison. Buying alcohol and gambling isn't a protected right in our Constitution.
"There's no First Amendment right to gamble. There's no First Amendment right to buy alcohol," Walters told Mashable. "What makes this different is it's speech. It's protected speech. You have the right to access protected speech as an adult. And so all of the other analogs [comparisons] that they're talking about do not apply."
In terms of whether this content — "hardcore and violent" pornography (research points to porn not inciting violent crime) — is obscene, thus not protected by the First Amendment, Walters said there hasn't been any obscenity determination to any content involved in this lawsuit. "All media is presumed to be protected unless there is a determination of obscenity," said Walters.
The American Principles Project, which held the rally, has a deeper interest in furthering age verification. The group is on the advisory board of Project 2025, the conservative policy blueprint for Donald Trump's second presidential term.
Age-verification and Project 2025Project 2025 is a 900+ page document that calls for many changes in the U.S., including banning pornography and imprisoning its creators. While age verification isn't an outright porn ban, it's a "back door" to one.
So said Project 2025 co-author Russell Vought, who Trump asked to return as director of the Office of Management and Budget. In a secret recording (by a paid actor and British journalist), Vought admitted that age-verification laws are a "back door" to a broader porn ban.
"We came up with an idea on pornography to make it so that the porn companies bear the liability for the underage use," Vought said, "as opposed to the person who visits the website getting to just certify" they're of-age, which was the status quo before these laws.
Vought added, "We’d have a national ban on pornography if we could, right?"
The Supreme Court decision on age-verification lawsWednesday's hearing was just that: a hearing. A decision will likely come this summer, according to CNN. However, there's already commentary about the decision, like CNN saying the judges lean towards supporting Texas's age-verification law. But you can't tell how a case will be decided based on comments at oral argument, Walters said.
There are several ways the decision can come down. The Supreme Court could find Texas's age-verification law unconstitutional and unsuitable to strict scrutiny. Walters explained that the highest court would then send it down to the Fifth Circuit and say they made the wrong decision.
Another outcome is that the Supreme Court sends the decision back down to the Fifth U.S. Circuit, saying they used the wrong standard of rational basis when they should use strict scrutiny.
Yet another possibility is that the Supreme Court decides that rational basis is the current standard, and the law doesn't need to hold up to strict scrutiny. In that case, Texas's age-verification law would stand.
SEE ALSO: Top 5 digital security tips from sex workers The stakes of Free Speech Coalition v. PaxtonOver the last several years, we have seen how information online gets blocked and shadowbanned, partly due to laws. FOSTA/SESTA (a set of bills that was supposedly anti-trafficking but in practice has done more harm to sex workers than to curb sex trafficking) has led to major social media platforms removing or shadowbanning educational and artistic sexual content, especially if it's from accounts of LGBTQ people, women, and people of color.
Banks, credit card companies, and financial apps have also barred sex workers and sites with sexual content, making this content more difficult to access. Banks have started closing accounts of non-sex workers, as well.
It's not just online content that is in danger, either. Conservatives are driving book bans and threatening access to birth control and the abortion pill.
The attacks on sexual freedom and online expression are like a pointillism painting: up close, you see the individual dots. If you pull back, you see the picture, explained Ricci Levy, president and CEO of the Woodhull Freedom Foundation.
"Pull back and see the whole picture of all the attacks on everything to do with our sexual selves," she said.
Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton isn't an isolated case. Depending on how the Supreme Court rules, online content could become more censored.
"There could be a number of other subjects that the state tries to restrict access to," Walters said. "Reproductive rights information, abortion, guns, politics, you name it. And so this case is going to set the standard of what the government is allowed to get away with in restricting access by adults" to this content.
"There's so much riding on this case," said Levy. "It's really the future of the internet…I don't believe it's going to stop here."
"There isn't a carve-out in this law to address educational materials, LGBTQ resources," Levy continued. She mentioned Vought's "back door" comment leading to the goal of the ban on pornography. "It's part of a larger attack on sexuality in this country."
The issue isn't about whether children can look at porn; neither porn creators nor sex worker advocates want that. "It's not about children, not really," Levy said. "It's about eliminating access to pornography or pornography as a whole."
It looks like Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk won't be the only tech CEOs attending President-elect Donald Trump's inauguration on Monday. According to The New York Times, Shou Chew, the CEO of TikTok, will also attend.
This comes as the Supreme Court continues to debate the fate of Chew's app in the U.S., which could result in 170 million people losing access to it. If the court upholds the ban, as other courts have done, it will go into effect on Sunday, Jan. 19.
SEE ALSO: Why are Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg at Trump's inauguration?It's unclear how that ban will look, but we know that while your phone might not self-combust the second you open TikTok, it won't work as you're used to it. App stores like Apple and Google and internet hosting companies will be penalized by the government if they distribute or update the app, and anonymous sources at TikTok told Reuters that U.S. users would be faced with a pop-up message that will take them to a website with information about the ban starting on Sunday, unless the Supreme Court steps in.
The Times reported that the invitation to the executive to attend the inauguration came from the Trump Vance Inaugural Committee. This represents a stark reversal in Trump's approach to TikTok. In 2020, Trump attempted to ban the app through an executive order, which didn't stick. Now, he appears to be supportive of the app. He met with TikTok executives in December at Mar-a-Lago in Florida, and during his campaign, he announced, "I'm gonna save TikTok."
SAVE $570: As of Jan. 16, get a like new Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra from Woot for $849.99, which is $570 off its new price of $1,419.99. That's a discount of 43%.
Opens in a new window Credit: Woot Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra $849.99 at WootIf it's time to toss your old smartphone and upgrade to a new one, you might want to think about skipping a trip to your carrier and buying online. Often you can save hundreds just by opting for a different color, amount of storage space, or even by buying used. That's the case with this particular phone deal, which can net you a fantastic device for a low price.
As of Jan. 16, get a like new Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra smartphone for $849.99 at Woot. That's $570 off its normal price of $1,419.99 when you buy new and a discount of 43%. Currently, only the Gray, Violet, and Yellow colorways are still available, and you can opt for devices that will be compatible with AT&T or T-Mobile. The unlocked phones are out of stock at the time of writing.
Like new condition means that the phones have been sourced from Samsung's 15-day buyer's remorse return program. They've been inspected and reconditioned accordingly by Samsung. They don't come in their original retail packaging, but they do come with a USB-C cable, S Pen, and SIM removal tool.
This smartphone is one of the best models you can currently purchase as part of the Galaxy lineup. It rocks a 6.8-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a 200MP main camera with ultrawide, telephoto, and periscope lenses. Under the hood, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor can handle all your day-to-day needs, and the 5,000 mAh battery means you've got juice all day long even if you're a heavy user.
Whether you just need something more reliable and up to date than your old phone or you can't resist a good deal, you'll want to snag this one as soon as possible – the other colorways likely will sell out fast.
With CES 2025 behind us, you might think that you'd have a break from big tech company announcements.
Well, think again!
Samsung's very own event, Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2025, is just around the corner: January 22 at 1pm ET to be exact.
While Samsung focused on "AI for All" at CES, showcasing mostly their latest home appliances and the AI-integrations in these products, the company held off on any announcements for their flagship line of smartphones, tablets, and other connected mobile devices.
That's what Samsung Galaxy Unpacked is for. Here's what to expect.
Galaxy S25 seriesThis shouldn't be a surprise as this is the main event of Samsung's annual event, A new line of Galaxy S smartphones will make their debut at Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2025.
Based on the naming conventions of the previous series', Samsung will very likely announce its latest smartphone trio at the event: the Galaxy S25, the Galaxy S25+, and the Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Some news about the new Galaxy S25 series of phones has already leaked, so we can likely expect a similar design as its predecessors, but with rounded edges. The Galaxy S25 and S25+ will also remain the same size as previous models, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra will apparently get a slight makeover with a 6.9 inch display. The S25 Ultra is also reported to receive an upgraded camera as its ultra-wide sensor gets a bump from 12MP to 50MP.
The biggest upgrade in the Galaxy S25 series of smartphones will be what it's powered by: Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite chip. This processor was made to handle generative AI, so we'll very likely see some big AI announcements from Samsung at the event as well.
One UI 7Already in beta, Samsung's One UI 7 built on Android 15, will likely be made official by the company at Samsung Galaxy Unpacked.
Samsung's custom interface will receive some much-needed upgrades with the release of One UI 7. Beta users seem to be reactive positively to the tweaked notification system in One UI 7.
Samsung has previously boasted about One UI 7's AI capabilities, calling it the "first integrated AI platform."
AI featuresSpeaking of AI, we will likely see a slew of announcements regarding AI-integration in the Galaxy S25 series and the One UI 7.
Rumors about a Samsung "AI agent" have been picking up, which would basically act as an AI assistant providing personal suggestions on a range of categories from fashion to transportation.
Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite chip will certainly usher in a range of AI possibilities that Samsung can surprise us with. So, what exactly Samsung will offer when it comes to AI and how it accomplishes this could end up being an unexpected highlight for Samsung Galaxy fans.
Galaxy Ring 2On the non-smartphone front, Samsung is expected to debut the Galaxy Ring 2 at the event.
The Galaxy Ring 2 might just show up as a teaser at this point with no hard release date, but the next generation wearable health device is expected to flaunt an extended battery life from its predecessor.
An updated sensor for more accurate measurements as well as new AI capabilities is also being rumored for the new Galaxy Ring 2.
AR GlassesRounding out the tech product 2025 Bingo card for the event is Samsung's AR glasses. The existence of these Samsung AR glasses are already confirmed but there's just rumors at this point that they may make their debut at Galaxy Unpacked.
The AR glasses are currently being referred to as Project Moohan and are being developed in partnership with Google and Qualcomm on the Android XR operating system.
Much like the Galaxy Ring 2, it would likely just be a teaser if Samsung's AR glasses did indeed make an appearance.
SAVE $100: The Garmin Venu 3S smartwatch (41mm, Ivory) is on sale at Amazon for $349.99, down from the normal price of $449.99. That's a 22% discount that matches the lowest price we've ever spotted at Amazon.
Opens in a new window Credit: Garmin Gamin Venu 3S (41mm, Ivory) $349.99 at AmazonIf you're just getting back into the swing of the work/life schedule after the holidays, you might still be considering resolutions for 2025. It's never too late to set some goals for this week or month to get a few more steps in each day. If you're looking for some accountability when it comes to healthy habits, check out this deal at Amazon on a reliable fitness tracker.
As of Jan. 16, the Garmin Venu 3S smartwatch (41mm, Ivory) is on sale for $349.99 at Amazon, down from the list price of $449.99. That's a 22% discount that takes $100 off. The sale price also matches the lowest we've seen at Amazon.
A long-time leader in the world of smartwatches, Garmin brings all of the brand's highlights to the Venu 3S. You'll be able to choose from over 30 preloaded GPS and indoor sports activities. You'll get continuous on-wrist heart rate monitoring and respiratory rates, too.
SEE ALSO: Rate your favorite smart home gear for a chance to win a $250 Amazon gift cardUnlike many smartwatches designed for tracking fitness, the Garmin Venu 3S can get up to 10 days of battery life when in smartwatch mode. For comparison, Mashable Tech Editor Kimberly Gedeon found both the Apple Watch SE and Apple Watch Series 9 got a bit over one day of battery life per charge.
With a bright OLED touchscreen display, the Garmin Venu 3S uses a 1.2-inch display, helping you navigate and view stats on your wrist. Garmin also gives users a daily Body Battery score, helping you get better insights into days when you can go all out on a workout compared to days you should try to get a nap in. The Garmin also helps with tracking sleep, giving you a readout of total sleep time, sleep stages, and personalized coaching into how to improve sleep.
When it comes to preloaded workout options, the Garmin includes both indoor and outdoor options, pool swimming, and activities for those who use a wheelchair. You can also follow along with animated workouts for yoga, HIIT, and strength training directly on your watch face. For those who have aspirations of a 5K, 10K, or half-marathon, get free training plans developed by expert coaches.
When paired with an Android or iOS smartphone, your Garmin can give on-wrist notifications of text messages, incoming phone calls, and calendar reminders. You can also respond to texts on the Garmin Venu 3S thanks to the on-watch keyboard.
If you're in the market for a smartwatch that excels in tracking fitness, today's low price on the Garmin Venu 3S is a perfect option. It comes with great fitness functions backed with the reliability of a Garmin device. Plus, the soft gold and ivory colorway gives this tracker a sleek and sophisticated look.
SAVE $100: As of Jan. 16, get the Beats Solo 4 Minecraft Edition headphones at Target for $99.99, down from their usual price of $199.99. That's a 50% discount.
Opens in a new window Credit: Amazon Beats Solo 4 Minecraft Edition $99.99 at AmazonLooking for a new pair of headphones? Love gaming? It's time to high-tail it on over to Target to take advantage of this deal.
As of Jan. 16, you can get the Beats Solo 4 Minecraft Edition headphones at Target for $99.99. That's $100 off their normal price of $199.99 and a 50% discount.
SEE ALSO: Nintendo Switch 2: Every new feature and game spotted in the announcementThese are the latest model of the Beats Solo range, newly refreshed this year with a battery life of up to 50 hours that can be quick-charged in just 10 minutes. But more importantly, if you're a Minecraft fan, this version of the popular Beats headphone features special Minecraft graphics, with a black frame and lime green Creeper imagery all over. It's a very cool look for Minecraft fans young or old.
Beyond aesthetics, the headphones also feature personalized Spatial Audio with head tracking for 3D surround sound and a more immersive listening experience. They also just sound fantastic, no matter what kind of music or content you're listening to.
For $99.99, you really can't go wrong here. Snatch them up before this deal disappears.
PREORDER NOW: PlayStation just dropped its Midnight Black collection. Preorder controllers, headphones, and console covers now, all available in Midnight Black.
PlayStation Midnight Black Collection Amazon PlayStation DualSense Edge Wireless Controller $199.99 at Amazon Pre-Order Here Target PlayStation Portal Remote Player $199.99 at Target Pre-Order Here Target PlayStation Pulse Elite $149.99 at Target Pre-Order Here Target PlayStation Pulse Explore $199.99 at Amazon Pre-Order Here PlayStation PlayStation 5 Console Cover $54.99 at PlayStation Pre-Order HerePlayStation just dropped their latest colorway, Midnight Black. This dark, sleek design is another way to give your gaming set-up a new look. From controller to console, if you want a uniform look, all items in the collection are now available for preorder as of January 16.
The full collection is available for preorder directly from PlayStation, but Amazon and Target are also offering advanced ordering on specific items. At Amazon, shop the DualSense Edge Wireless Controller, which allows you to map your own controls for a customized gaming experience. In addition to the controllers, PlayStation's Pulse Elite headphones and Pulse Explore earbuds are also available in Midnight Black. Plus, if you want your console to match, it won't involve getting a whole new device. Instead for just $54.99, you can buy console covers in Midnight Black.
Preorder the Midnight Black collection now and be one of the first to get your hands on the new color.
Microsoft will stop supporting Office apps on Windows 10 this year. Also it really wants you to upgrade to Windows 11.
According to a Microsoft blog post, the company will end support for Microsoft 365 apps on Windows 10 on Oct. 14, 2025. That includes Office apps: Microsoft Teams, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and OneDrive.
SEE ALSO: Microsoft wants you to upgrade to Windows 11 or buy a new computerBut that doesn't mean your apps will stop working when the deadline hits. A Microsoft support page spotted by The Verge said "the applications will continue to function as before. However, we strongly recommend upgrading to Windows 11 to avoid performance and reliability issues over time." So because Microsoft will no longer maintain them after the cutoff date, the apps will gradually get buggier.
Microsoft has been pushing hard for PC users to upgrade to Windows 11. The latest operating system has been out since 2021, but the vast majority of users still use its predecessor. According to Statcounter, 63 percent still run Windows 10, while only 34 percent have upgraded to Windows 11. The low adoption rate is largely due to Windows 11 system requirements like a TPM (Trusted Platform Module) that PC users are unable or unwilling to comply with.
Nonetheless, Microsoft has made it clear that upgrading is the only option. Especially since Windows 11 has Copilot AI features that the company has spent the last few years developing and aggressively promoting.
In October 2024, Microsoft first announced the end of Windows 10 support, and is calling 2025, "the year of the Windows 11 PC refresh," instead of advancing the OS timeline with Windows 12.
Wrestler-turned-actor John Cena (Peacemaker, Ricky Stanicky) adds "talk show host" to his resume with the release of his upcoming Roku series What Drives You, which should appeal to car lovers and wrestling fans.
SEE ALSO: 2025 TV preview: All the TV shows you need to know, and where to stream themIn What Drives You, Cena meets up with celebrities at their homes, studios, and garages to learn about their favorite cars, take them out for a spin, and hear stories about why these vehicles mean so much to their owners. Think of it as Cena's take on Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee. Except instead of comedians, the guests include YouTuber turned pro wrestler Logan Paul, country star Jelly Roll, Cena's former WWE rival The Miz, and Blink-182 drummer Travis Barker.
Across its eight-episode first season, What Drives You will take Cena from Los Angeles to Puerto Rico to Nashville and beyond, and will feature cars like a Tesla Model X Plaid, a Buick GNX, and a Ford Bronco.
PREORDER: As of Jan. 16, the new Lego Twilight The Cullen House set ($219.99) is available for preorder through the Lego Store. Shipping is expected to begin Feb. 1, and orders placed before Jan. 28 will quality for a free Valentine's Day Box set.
Opens in a new window Credit: Lego / Lionsgate Twilight The Cullen House set $219.99 at Lego StoreIt's been over 12 years (4,444 days to be exact) since we were treated to the last Twilight film. If you've been dreaming about the romantasy saga ever since the first book appeared in 2005, Lego has graciously gifted us something truly special in time for Valentine's Day 2025.
Lego just announced Twilight The Cullen House set which is already available for preorder at Lego's online store for $219.99. Orders are expected to ship out beginning Feb. 1. Plus, if you order before Jan. 28, you'll be eligible to score a free Celebration Series: Valentine's Day Box set.
SEE ALSO: Rate your favorite smart home gear for a chance to win a $250 Amazon gift cardWith 2,001 pieces, the Cullen House bring us right back to the family's iconic home in Forks, Wash. Recreating the sleek, modern design, the Lego set's three-story design brings back all our favorite memories at the home. You can remove the roof and any level of the home for a better peek at the details that include the kitchen, living room, and bathroom of Edward Cullen's home.
Credit: LegoThere's a buildable grand piano in the living room, Bella's red truck, and a tall tree suitable for Bella and Edward to climb. The set also comes with seven minifigures including Bella Swan, Edward Cullen, Jacob Black, along with Carlisle and Alice Cullen, to name a handful. There's also a posable figure of Jacob in wolf form.
The Twilight Lego set is part of the brand's Ideas Program which allows builders to submit their best ideas for the chance of it becoming a commercially available set. The design of the Twilight Cullen House Set comes from California-based fan Nick Micheels.
Credit: LegoLego suggests the Twilight set is best for builders 18 years and older and it comes with step-by-step construction instructions.
If searching for the perfect Valentine's gift for yourself or someone who loves the Twilight saga, jump onto this preorder opportunity at the Lego store to snag the Twilight The Cullen House set. If previous preorders are any indication, this set could sell out quickly.
SAVE $50.95: As of Jan. 16, get the Beats Pill portable speaker for $99.99, down from its usual price of $149.95. That's a discount of 33%.
Opens in a new window Credit: Amazon Beats Pill $99.99 at AmazonIf you're the type of person who likes to take music with you wherever you go, you're probably eyeing a powerful, portable speaker. They're super versatile and great for sharing music and podcasts with others, or enjoying those things at a higher volume than what your phone or computer can provide. Now's a great time to take advantage of an Amazon deal on a tiny but mighty speaker.
As of Jan. 16, you can get the Beats Pill for $99.99, down from its usual price of $149.95. That's $50.95 off and a discount of 33%. Currently, this price only applies to the champagne gold colorway.
SEE ALSO: The JBL Go 4 portable speaker is back to its lowest-ever priceThe Beats Pill is a small but powerful speaker that boasts up to 24 hours of battery life and some seriously kicking bass. That's all thanks to its bigger woofer that gives you deeper sound with rich tone and crisp treble. And if you're worried about volume, don't be. This thing is loud.
It's also perfect for taking just about anywhere, with IP67 water resistance that makes it great for a pool or beach trip. You can party all day long, and then juice it all back up with a USB-C cable when you're ready.
You likely won't see this deal around for long, so snag it while you still can.
Jeff Bezos' new rocket, taller than the Statue of Liberty, has blasted into space.
The giant 320-foot-tall New Glenn rocket, named for legendary U.S. astronaut John Glenn, achieved a successful maiden launch after launching from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station just after 2 a.m. ET on Jan. 16, 2025. The Blue Origin rocket, designed to have a reusable first stage powered by seven powerful engines, provides valuable competition in the rapidly-evolving rocket industry.
The rocket has been in development for over a decade. So this was a much anticipated launch.
"We did it! Orbital. Great night for Team Blue," Dave Limp, Blue Origin's CEO, posted online after the launch.
SEE ALSO: NASA scientist viewed first Voyager images. What he saw gave him chills."On to spring and trying again on the landing," Limp added, referencing the ambitious but unsuccessful attempt to land the rocket's first stage on the droneship Jacklyn in the Atlantic Ocean. This is no easy feat; it took SpaceX many tries to land a booster.
Here's the behemoth rocket, one of the largest ever built, launching to Earth's orbit:
Tweet may have been deleted Tweet may have been deleted Tweet may have been deleted Tweet may have been deletedBy 2026, Blue Origin hopes to kick up its launch cadence significantly, launching up to twice a month.
The company's rocket factory is nine miles from the launch pad you see above, which would allow Blue Origin to rapidly refurbish and deliver rockets to the Space Force base.
New Glenn, after a successful first launch, will compete with the heavy-lift rockets of SpaceX, a company that has come to dominate the rocket industry.